Best Answer

Google is making us less smart (APEX) .

User Avatar

Tyra briggs

Lvl 3
2y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
User Avatar

Yulissa Alfaro-River...

Lvl 1
2y ago
User Avatar

Tyra briggs

Lvl 1
2y ago
np !

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: In his article Nicholas Carr asks us to question whether?
Write your answer...
Still have questions?
magnify glass
Continue Learning about American Government

What was the political question in Baker v Carr?

The political question in Baker v. Carr, (1962) was whether the US Supreme Court could interfere with the legislative branch of government to decide how voter apportionment maps could be drawn.The Supreme Court abandoned its position that voting district apportionment was a political question because the states (Tennessee, in this case) failed to draw district lines in a way that guaranteed equal representation to all voters. Bakerwas soon followed by two other cases addressing legislative representation, Reynolds v. Sims, 377 US 533 (1964) and Wesberry v. Sanders, 376 US 1 (1964).Case Citation:Baker v. Carr, 369 US 186 (1962)

Is Reginald Carr still on deathrow in Kansas?

Reginald Carr is still in Kansas on deathrow, yes.

Who won Baker v Carr?

Baker won the case.

Who were the parties in the Baker v Carr case?

Charles W. Baker and other Tennessee voters were the petitioners (like a plaintiff) and Tennessee Secretary of State Joe C. Carr was the nominal respondent (like a defendant) in the case because his office was responsible for conducting elections, not because he or his office had been responsible for creating policy or voting districts. The Tennessee state legislature was being challenged, but Carr was sued ex officio in place of the state (which has sovereign immunity, per law).Case Citation:Baker v. Carr, 369 US 186 (1962)

What did Emily Carr do?

Emily Carr was a writing and an artist, she wrote many books and painting many pictures. She painted in Victoria, and moved to do art colage in San-fran-cisco. This is all corect, I found all the information on the RIGHT internet!!

Related questions

When was Wooda Nicholas Carr born?

Wooda Nicholas Carr was born on 1871-02-06.

N his article Is Google Making Us Stupid Nicholas Carr implies that?

Search engines make us less attentive readers

When did Nicholas Carras die?

Nicholas Carras died on November 23, 2006, in Sherman Oaks, California, USA.

Does IT matter is a book written by?

Nicholas G. Carr

What are the release dates for The Colbert Report - 2005 Nicholas Carr 6-86?

The Colbert Report - 2005 Nicholas Carr 6-86 was released on: USA: 30 June 2010

What are the release dates for The Colbert Report - 2005 Nicholas Carr 4-121?

The Colbert Report - 2005 Nicholas Carr 4-121 was released on: USA: 25 September 2008

What does nicholas carr want us to consider in his article?

Whether search engines have affected our ability to concentrate

How many colour pages are there in Emily carr's article art as collective memory?

city in which Emily carr's the works of art were exhibited

What has the author Nicholas G Carr written?

Nicholas G. Carr has written: 'The Shallows' -- subject(s): Physiological effect, Internet, Neuropsychology, Psychological aspects 'The shallows' -- subject(s): Physiological effect, Internet, Neuropsychology, Psychological aspects 'The big switch'

What type of audience Nicholas Carr was trying to reach in this essay?

Nicholas Carr was trying to reach a broad audience of readers who are interested in the impact of technology on society and cognition. His essay aimed to provoke thought and discussion among individuals concerned about the potential consequences of excessive internet use on our brains and attention spans.

Caliper test question what is the next letter in the sequence CARR?


Nicholas carr argument about it is no longer gives a companies a competitive advantage?

Carr's main argument is that as the ubiquity of information technology grows, and costs lessen, the overall advantage decreases. He originally published his argument in the Harvard Business Review, and it caused a backlash from those who disagreed.