answersLogoWhite

0

Justices Ginsburg and Breyer agreed that a company should be liable for the illegal use of its technology in the Grokster case. The company is only liable if it actively promotes the illegal uses of its technology.

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

JudyJudy
Simplicity is my specialty.
Chat with Judy
EzraEzra
Faith is not about having all the answers, but learning to ask the right questions.
Chat with Ezra
FranFran
I've made my fair share of mistakes, and if I can help you avoid a few, I'd sure like to try.
Chat with Fran

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: On what issues did Justices Ginsburg and Breyer agree in the Grokster case?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about American Government

Why is civility so important for the appearance of justice and propriety in your courts?

justices are supposed to be concerned only with constitutional issues, not partisan politics. So civility and respect for any justices opinion is required, not partisan politics.


What are the steps in deciding major supreme court cases?

Someone petitions the Supreme Court to review a case on appealThe lawyers submit briefsThe justices vote to decide which cases to hearThe Clerk schedules oral argumentsThe justices read all briefs and lower court documentsThe justices have their clerks research precedents and other informationThe justices listen to oral argumentsThe justices hold a case conference to discuss issues and take a voteOne justice is assigned to write the official opinion of the CourtThe opinion is circulated for commentsOther justices write concurring or dissenting opinions (optional)The decision is released to the parties and the general public


Which supreme court procedure involves justices discussing a case debating its key issues and arriving at their own opinions on the appropriate ruling?

Deliberation(Apex)


What Supreme Court procedure involves justices discussing a case debating its key issues and arriving at their own opinions on the appropriate ruling?

Sharing opinions- Apex


What do you think of the split opinion between justices?

Legal issues can be very complex, and it is understandable to me that fully qualified judges could arrive at different decisions about the same issue. It has often been said that there are two sides to every issue. Few issues are so clearly defined that they have only one possible interpretation.