Justices Ginsburg and Breyer agreed that a company should be liable for the illegal use of its technology in the Grokster case. The company is only liable if it actively promotes the illegal uses of its technology.
justices are supposed to be concerned only with constitutional issues, not partisan politics. So civility and respect for any justices opinion is required, not partisan politics.
Someone petitions the Supreme Court to review a case on appealThe lawyers submit briefsThe justices vote to decide which cases to hearThe Clerk schedules oral argumentsThe justices read all briefs and lower court documentsThe justices have their clerks research precedents and other informationThe justices listen to oral argumentsThe justices hold a case conference to discuss issues and take a voteOne justice is assigned to write the official opinion of the CourtThe opinion is circulated for commentsOther justices write concurring or dissenting opinions (optional)The decision is released to the parties and the general public
Deliberation(Apex)
Sharing opinions- Apex
Not necessarily. The US Supreme Court sometimes issues per curiam opinions that are binding (on the instant case) but unsigned; however, these decisions do not set precedent for future cases.
Justice Breyer will be presented with the issue of same-sex marriage in 2013. Supreme Court justices do not discuss issues that may come before them. Also, it does not matter if he is in favor or not, he must interpret the law according to the Constitution.
The two main voting blocks on the Supreme Court are typically referred to as the liberal wing and the conservative wing. The liberal wing usually consists of justices who generally support more liberal interpretations of the law and tend to favor progressive outcomes in cases. The conservative wing generally consists of justices who interpret the law more conservatively and tend to favor conservative outcomes. However, it is important to note that the Court's composition and dynamics can vary over time and on specific issues.
The US Supreme Court justices don't talk publicly about social and political matters, particularly those that may come before the Court, so the only way to determine where a justice stands on the issues is to examine his or her voting record. Ginsburg's record of jurisprudence indicates she strongly favors same-sex domestic-partnerships and privacy rights; however, there is no way of know how she would vote on a case involving gay marriage.As well her being a liberal points she would be in support of this and her granddaughter and i speculate she supports it. (her granddaughter is a good friend of mine)
Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who served as a US Supreme Court Justice from 1993 until her death in 2020, was known for her progressive ideology. She was a strong advocate for equal rights, particularly for women's rights and gender equality. Ginsburg consistently supported liberal positions on issues such as abortion rights, LGBTQ+ rights, and affirmative action.
Stephen Breyer, a former Associate Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, is known for his pragmatic approach to the law, emphasizing the importance of the consequences of legal decisions. He supports a liberal interpretation of the Constitution, advocating for issues like reproductive rights, environmental protection, and healthcare access. Breyer promotes the idea of balancing individual rights with the needs of society and values judicial restraint over strict constitutionalism. His philosophy often highlights the role of the judiciary in addressing contemporary social issues.
The Arizona Supreme Court is composed of seven justices. These justices are appointed by the governor and serve renewable six-year terms. The court is the highest judicial authority in the state, handling appeals and important constitutional issues.
The justices on the US Supreme Court do not even always agree with themselves on issues regarding the US Constitution. Even justices recommended by the US President and approved by the US Senate may have disagreements with the president who nominated them.
justices are supposed to be concerned only with constitutional issues, not partisan politics. So civility and respect for any justices opinion is required, not partisan politics.
Deliberation-the justices meet privetly to share thier opinion and discuss the case
As of October 2023, the liberal justices of the U.S. Supreme Court are Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson. They are generally known for their more progressive interpretations of the law, often advocating for issues related to civil rights, reproductive rights, and social justice. Their judicial philosophies frequently contrast with those of the conservative justices on the Court.
A person who serves on the Supreme Court is called a Supreme Court Justice. Justices are appointed to interpret and uphold the Constitution, making decisions on significant legal and constitutional issues. In the United States, there are typically nine justices, including one Chief Justice and eight Associate Justices.
The justices who voted in favor of Roe v. Wade in 1973 were generally considered more liberal. The decision was supported by a majority of justices appointed by Democratic presidents, reflecting a more progressive stance on issues of privacy and individual rights. Conversely, the dissenting justices were primarily appointed by Republican presidents, aligning with a more conservative viewpoint on abortion.