0
Such a law would be unconstitutional, since the United States Constitution specifically establishes the judiciary and its scope of power in Article III.
Article III, Section 1 establishes the judiciary:
"The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour, and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services, a Compensation, which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office." Article III, Section 2establishes the Supreme Court's scope of responsibility (excerpt): "The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority;--to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public ministers and Consuls;--to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction;--to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;--to Controversies between two or more States;--between a State and Citizens of another State;--between Citizens of different States;--between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects."
There are plenty of examples of people, including Congressmen, who have been unhappy with the High Court's rulings, or with its perceived political leanings. But the Court's mission is to contribute to the government's system of checks and balances, and to interpret the Constitution and legislation, not to cater to the preferences of any individual, party, or political group.
If enough members of Congress are at odds with the Supreme Court's interpretation of a law, they can change the law. They cannot, however, restrict the Court's power as granted by the Constitution.
See Related Links for the full text of the U.S. Constitution, Article III.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What did congress have the right to for the future of slavery?
Restrict the future of slavery
Did congress have the right to ____ the future of slavery?
Restrict the future of slavery
What powers are held by the States in the federal system?
Article 1 Section 8 of the Constitution gives the federal government 18 "enumerated powers" of the Congress. The 9th and 10th Amendments restrict the congress to ONLY those functions, and reserve all other powers to the states or to the People.
What of Congress's powers is implied through the necessary and proper clause?
The power to pass a national minimum wage law.
States rights by voting?
I am not sure what you are asking. Voting rights are given in the constitution and the states have made laws to restrict some voting rights, but the federal government is suppose to protect voting rights.
What if a member of Congress were upset over the way the Supreme Court was interpreting the Constitution and proposed a law that would restrict the Supreme Court's ability to hear cases on appeal?
The Congressperson's law could not be passed because the Supreme Court is granted jurisdiction through the Constitution. Judicial power in the United States is granted through article three.
What branch of the government does the constitution restrict?
it restricts all the branches but the most clear example is restrictions on the congress the restrictions can be found in article 1 section 9 of the US Constitution.
Who proposed toleration act of 1649 and why?
Lord Baltimore proposed the act to restrict the religious rights of Christians
Where in the constitution does it give the President the power to limit immigrants entering the US?
This is not is in the constitution. The constitution gives Congress the power to restrict immigration. The president has the power and the duty to enforce immigration laws passed by Congress. I can not tell you exactly what the immigration laws are, but actions of the president concerning immigration must be based on immigration laws. If not, federal courts can rule them void and disallow them.
Did the congress have the right to the future of slavery?
Restrict the future of slavery
What did congress have the right to for the future of slavery?
Restrict the future of slavery
Did congress have the right to ____ the future of slavery?
Restrict the future of slavery
Has the US Supreme Court acted to restrict the political rights of the Constitution?
The supreme court has indeed acted to restrict the political rights of the constitution. In 1875 a group of women from Missouri appealed to the supreme court to challenge the Missouri law that denied them the right to vote in a case called Minor v. Happersett. The Supreme court ruled against these women based on the statement in our constitution "All men are created equal." It was not until congress passed the 19th amendment in 1920 that women received full political rights.
Does the Louisiana constitution expand or restrict the power of the state?
A constitution could do both at the same time. You would need to read the Louisiana constitution to get a good idea of how this works.
Can the United States government restrict your freedom of religion?
I don't think they can it is against the Constitution.
Can congress restrict arms sale?
No beause arms sell is global and peplo can sell it ilgele
Which constitution amendment has been used to restrict the scope of authority by the federal government over the state?
10th.
