answersLogoWhite

0

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Does stop and search invade peoples privacy?

The correct terminology is Stop and Frisk - and the Supreme Court has ruled that if the officer's 'reasonable suspicion' for the stop can be articulated, it is, in fact, legal and proper. See: Terry v. Ohio


Under HIPAA exceptions to the right of privacy are those records involving?

Under HIPPA, list 5 exceptions to the right of privacy involving records


The right to privacy inherent in the concept of due process has been applied with the most controversy recently in cases involving?

The right to privacy is inherent in the recent controversial cases involving abortion.


What is an issue involving collecting storing and disseminating information about individuals?

privacy issues


Issues involving who may obtain information and how much they should pay for this information?

Privacy


What Supreme Court decisions extended an individual and right to privacy?

Griswold v. Connecticut


Did the Supreme Court reinterpret civil liberties in Katz v. US?

Answer this It expanded the right to privacy to include situations in which a person has a reasonable expectation of privacy. question…


How did the Supreme Court reinterpret civil liberties in Katz v. US?

Answer this It expanded the right to privacy to include situations in which a person has a reasonable expectation of privacy. question…


Which provision of the Constitution was used by the Supreme Court in deciding that Americans had a right to marital privacy?

the Ninth Amendment


The Supreme Court's decision in Griswold v. Connecticut?

established the right to privacy as existing in the Bill of Rights


Social and ethical issues involving cellphones?

reliability, people and machines, privacy, surveillance, digital divide and equality of access


What is the significance of the Supreme Court case California vs. Greenwood in relation to privacy rights and Fourth Amendment protections?

In the Supreme Court case California vs. Greenwood, the court ruled that individuals do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their garbage left outside for collection. This decision has been significant in shaping privacy rights and Fourth Amendment protections by establishing that once something is discarded and left in a public place, it is no longer protected by privacy laws.