Conservatism prefers a minimal to non existent role for the state, and promotes free market economic policies, that is, that the government should not intervene to protect any interest, and that market forces will determine which company is successful. Conservatives believe that, with everybody competing in an open market place, services, goods and the economy as a whole will improve in its quality and efficiency.
Criticisms would be that there is no safety net for those who lose out in the capitalist system, those who do not own the means of production and can only sell their labour. Opportunities tend to stay within certain sects of society in a laissez faire approach. With the state taking a minimal role, conservatism tends to go hand in hand with private healthcare and education, which, for those of a lesser income, is hard to achieve.
Classic Liberalism, (around the turn of the 19th/20th century) was similar to this in many ways, believing in free trade, and demanding the end of protectionism. Some argued that the advent of liberalism in the late 19th and early 20th century was merely a front for the upwardly mobile merchant class, enshrining everyone's rights as 'free men', ultimately imprisoned however, by the adverse effects of a capitalist system. Liberalism, (at least, in the US and UK sense) changed in meaning through the inter war period, largely due to the crisis of boom and bust economics, leaving people doubting the free market. This change was what continental europeans might call social democracy. Liberalism came to mean a state that protected the rights of free men, and allowed free markets to operate, but also provided social security in the form of a welfare state. (perhaps most notably in the labour govt. of the UK after WW2). Protectionist attitudes towards national companies obviously limited the operation of the free market, (which, it is argued, must be universal for it to work in its purest sense), but also provided institutions such as the minimum wage and other previously denied rights for workers. This change also brought about the organisations of workers into trade unions, able to represent themselves more efficiently.
the answer to this question previous to mine was incredibly biased. No one system of government is perfect, and in every type of society in the real world (not the purely theoretical) somebody loses, and will seek to critique.
This defines these two political ideologies.
http://academic.regis.edu/jriley/libcons.htm
Like any kind of government, limited government has pros and cons, for example Pro- it constitutes the idea that the "bourgeois" (middle class) get to make decisions in the government according to what is better for the masses. Con-In today's society (take the US for example) many stopped think about what is best for the people and have started thinking about how to attack the other political group (democrats v. republicans) and most of the time what needs to be done to improve the people's lifestyle does not occur because of differences between political parties.
Classical Liberalism supports:- laissez-faire liberalism- limited government involvement- free market-capitalist society- individual property rights-individualismModern Liberalism supports:- government involvement-crade to grave welfare-free tradeBoth support freedom. Classical liberals believe that leaving everyone alone achieves the most freedom. Modern liberals believe that unless the state provides welfare, the poor are not free.
It refers to the differences between all humans.
A conference committee is the committee that is temporarily created to solve differences between two houses over proposed legislation.
How much the government should be involved in the economy
either republican or democrat, a moderate is a centrist between conservatism and liberalism, rather a soggy, flip-floppy character most of the time
Both liberalism and conservatives look for ideas to improve society Conservatives believe in a more traditional view, , and let the free market thrive, religiouse freedom, the right to bear arms, etc. which s very simular to liberalism but it can also be very different.
What is the difference between realism and liberalism?
The question suggests that liberals are not realists. We could also post the question, "What is the core disagreement between conservatism and realism?" You can see the difficulty, the conflict, and WikiAnswers does not play favorites. Liberalist thinking is no more or less realistic than conservative thinking, and any point of view can be argued.
Communism: -everyone makes same amount of money -government regulations are everywhere -must abide by government rules -no freedom conservatism: -Ability to pursue the "American Dream" (if u have heard that) -Deregulate -Decrease the size of government -many freedoms I REALLY TRIED TO MAKE THIS ANSWER AS UNBIASED AS I COULD... ITS HARD!!!
Classical liberalism emphasizes limited government intervention in individuals' lives and the economy, prioritizing individual freedom and private property rights. Modern liberalism, also known as progressivism, supports government intervention to address social and economic inequalities, promoting social welfare programs and regulations to protect workers and consumers.
The Scopes Trial, also known as the "monkey trial," reflected the cultural divide between urban modernists and rural traditionalists in the 1920s. The trial pitted fundamentalist beliefs against modern science, highlighting the clash between rural religious conservatism and urban intellectual liberalism. The trial exposed the tensions between these two worldviews and the challenges of navigating social change and cultural conflict in America during that period.
The industrial system had lot of features that effected society, such as coal and steam that replaced wind and water as basic sources. These effects changed Europe from being economy based to a manufacturing by machines society. This system spread and changed the world lots of people moved from the county side to cities to work in factories
Liberalism focuses on the idea of freedom and equality to benefit all people. Absolutism concentrates all power and privilege into the hands of just a few or, more commonly, just the monarch.
differences between now and then 1905s
differences between errors and frauds
It is actually pretty complicated. Probably the easiest way to explain it is that liberals tend to believe the government is responsible for ensuring opportunity and Conservatives believe the individual should take responsibility on their own and create their own opportunity. But it is not that cut and dry. I am a conservative and I believe in helping people get started but I don't believe it is my responsibility to carry them forever. I guess I believe in the old adage that if I give a man a fish I feed him today but if I teach him to fish he can feed himself forever. Here is a link that will help distinguish these two very different political ideologies. http://academic.regis.edu/jriley/libcons.htm