the fraction should be 3/4
The numerator is the the top part of the fraction, the denominator is the bottom part of the fraction.
ms. shubert is a bag of dust
That you have the magority of a fraction of something.
When one party is elected in a two-party system, they represent a much larger portion of the population than a party would in a multi party system where they would represent only a small fraction of the total population of the country.Also, even if voters haven't followed an election, they know which party they identify with usually, and they can vote based on that.(an added bonus is debates between candidates are way better between only two people. Imagine a nine person debate.)
That compromise is known as the Great Compromise.
The three-fifths compromise came about because Southern states wanted to include the enslaved in their population count to gain delegates in the House of Representatives and the Northern states objected to this because slaves were legally considered property so the committee came up with this solution called the Three-Fifths Compromise which was to count each slave as three-fifths of a free person for taxation and representation.
I am not counting any fractions!
The numerator.
equivilent
The fraction 3/5 is compromise. It is in between delegates.
Multiply it by successive counting numbers.
Yes, by putting them over 1.
Multiply the numerator and the denominator by the same counting number.
Multiply the numerator and the denominator by the same counting number.
The Three-Fifths Compromise was a compromise reached between delegates from southern states and those from northern states during the 1787 United States Constitutional Convention. The debate was over if, and if so, how, slaves would be counted when determining a state's total population for constitutional purposes.
A fraction of the population own their own houses.