0
Still curious? Ask our experts.
Chat with our AI personalities
Ezra
Fran
Blake
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
When did they cancel the sugar act?
In 1766 Great Britain repealed the Sugar Act and replaced it with the Revenue Act of 1766.
What is the term that means to cancel such as the stamp act?
the introduction of the declaration of independence is called
How did the judicial branch under Jefferson serve as a check on executive and legislative branches?
the judicial branch has a duty uphold the constitution .It must be able to determine when a federal law conflicts with the constitution and to nullify,or cancel, unconstitutional law ----N.Tran
What is a measure that has become a law?
an act
A law passed to punished someone for an act committed before the act was declared illegal congress's?
It is called an ex post facto law.
What previous law did the Kansas Nebraska act cancel?
Compromise of 1850.
What term means to cancel an act or law?
Oh, dude, that's like when you're just like, "Nah, I'm good." The term for canceling an act or law is "repeal." It's like when you're at a party and you're just like, "I'm out," but for laws and stuff.
What is the term that means to cancel such as to cancel the stamp act?
When we cancel a legal bill such as the Stamp Act we use the term "repeal" (to revoke or withdraw formally or officially), or "rescind" (revoke, cancel, or repeal (a law, order, or agreement). Other suitable choices include revoke, repeal, cancel, reverse, overturn, overrule, annul, nullify, void, invalidate, abolish or quash. Because we live in a society of laws we have many terms that vary but slightly in their meanings..
What means to cancel?
That's right, to repeal a law is to cancel or revoke it.
To cancel a law is called?
To cancel a law if may be NULLIFIED or REPEALED.
What term that means to cancel such as to cancel the Stamp Act?
repeal!
What is the term to get rid of a law take it back or cancel it?
Repeal is to take back, or to cancel, a law
Why don't action-reaction force cancel each other out?
Action and reaction forces do not cancel each other out because they act on different objects. According to Newton's third law of motion, for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. These forces may have the same magnitude, but they act in opposite directions on two different objects, so they do not cancel each other out.
Why the equal action reaction forces do not cancel each other when one person hits a ball?
The action and reaction forces act on different objects. For two forces to cancel each other - and provide a net force of zero, for Newton's First Law - they must act on the same object.
Action and reaction forces acting in opposite directions do cancel out because they act on different objects true or false?
True. According to Newton's third law of motion, action and reaction forces always act on different objects and have equal magnitudes but opposite directions. So, when these forces act in opposite directions on different objects, they effectively cancel each other out.
In newtons third law the action and reaction forces is act on different bodies it is correct or not and why?
had that not been the case then the two forces would cancel each other as they act on the same body being equal and opposite
Do action and reaction forces acting in opposite directions cancel out because they act on different objects?
In order to cancel out, they must act on the same object.
