government spending and taxation.
John Dickinson was a firm supporter of "No Taxation Without Representation". He argued that there was injustice of external taxation because the British were exploiting the wealth of the colonies.
representation has to do with taxation because ,if u want to speak out against a tax law you would have to speak out first
The British colonists in America before the War of Independence (no taxation without representation /in the British Parliament/).
no one of historical significance ever said that. However, Jonathan Mayhew (1750) coined the phrase "Taxation without representation is tyranny" From 1765-1776, this was reduced to Taxation without Representation! as a cry for revolution. Patrick Henry (VA, 1775) first wrote (resolved) that taxation without representation was unconstitutional
Yes, "marked" and "tax" can both function as adjectives. "Marked" can describe something that has a noticeable feature or characteristic, while "tax" can describe something related to taxation or the payment of taxes.
This question requires more context. Which country? As different countries have different taxation systems and laws. Personal taxation or company taxation? Here again there are normally different levels of taxation.
uniformity in taxation
outline the reasons for taxation
i'm pretty sure it was "No Taxation Without Representation."
Taxation without representation is wrong. Taxation is needed to pay for many government programs.
Cheryl D. Block has written: 'Corporate taxation' -- subject(s): Corporations, Taxation, Law and legislation 'Corporation Taxation' 'Corporate taxation' -- subject(s): Corporations, Taxation, Law and legislation
The answer is for a massive shift to indirect taxation.
government spending and taxation.
example of power taxation
role of taxation in business
The power of taxation is that every government needs it. No country can survive without the money that is brought in from taxation.