0
What are the major causes of the decentralized nature of political parties?
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
the two major parties are often described as though they were highly organized, close knit, well disciplined groups. neither party is anything of the kind, both are highly decentralized, fragmented, disjointed, and often beset by factions and internal squabbling. (Federalism, the nominating process)
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is political banter?
Banter that is political in nature.
Why did political parties develop so quickly in the American political system?
Frankly, because it is human nature for us to band together into like-minded groups. We seem to seek out similar individuals (however one wishes to define "similar") to bond and group with. Politics is no different than any other area in this respect. In retrospect, any period of ANY government form without some type of political parties should be considered an anomaly. Even in governments with only one political party (or systems which claim not to have any parties), a closer inspection will reveal groups which operate in a manner similar (or even indistinguishable) from a formal political party.
What is the first word of the declaration of independence?
When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
What is the subject and predicate in the first sentence of the declaration of independence?
Well, let's look at it: "When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation." if you break this down it basically means that respect requires that they should state the causes which urge them to the separation
Why did the framers of the constitution why not expect political parties?
Kelly, They believed that parties, factions as they called them, would be bad for republican self government because people could become more loyal to their party than the country and more concerned for the party's power than the good of the common weal. Michael Montagne Per the previous comment, the founding fathers knew that factions would naturally develop. See federalist paper #10. Madison describes faction as "...a number of citizens, whether amounting to a majority or a minority of the whole, who are united and actuated by some common impulse of passion, or of interest, adversed to the rights of other citizens, or to the permanent and aggregate interests of the community." Madison also said, "There are again two methods of removing the causes of faction: the one, by destroying the liberty which is essential to its existence; the other, by giving to every citizen the same opinions, the same passions, and the same interests." Because neither of these are possible factions must exist. However, the way to maintain a balance of power is through a "multiplicity of faction." If they are all fighting for the same power, factions will give a little to gain a little. If the founding fathers established political parties, they would grow in power too rapidly to control and before you knew it the government would become an oligarchy - rule of the few, and/or tyrannical.
What are the major of the decentralize nature of political parties?
Federalism
How you think Americans should have listened to washigton warning about political parties?
Yes, in retrospect. He was right, but it is human nature to take sides on issues and I don't know how we could have avoided having political parties. If there is any doubt about his observations all we have to do is look at the current situation we are in concerning political parties.
Do political parties have too much or too little influence on government?
They are the government, by their nature they control policy of the government in power.
Is political parties determine the nature of foreign policy?
They does because it is them who form the part of polices and it is them who discuss all the issues based on the policies to the government departments.
What is a characteristic of a weakened political party?
there are more independent voters and people are now more educated to the corrupt nature of parties
What has the author Jean Blondel written?
Jean Blondel has written: 'Cabinets in Western Europe' 'The political factors accounting for the relationship between governements and the parties which support them' 'Ministerial careers and the nature of parliamentary government' 'Voters, Parties and Leaders'
What is Canada most of Democrats or Republicans?
The American political parties of Democrats and Republicans don't fit well into other countries' political systems. That is, the unique nature of American culture and politics makes it very difficult to map American political parties to their equivalents in other countries. In addition, the stated goals of both American political parties is often at radical odds with actual practices and pronouncements from those parties, making the comparison even more difficult - in most other countries, parties tend to stick rather closely to their stated philosophies, as that is their primary means of attracting support in a very pluralistic political party environment.
What political system did Hitler have in Germany?
Politically he banned all other political parties other than the nazi party
What is political banter?
Banter that is political in nature.
How did newspapers contribute to the rivalry between political parties?
Newspapers played a significant role in fueling the rivalry between political parties by often aligning themselves with a specific party and promoting their viewpoints while criticizing the opposing party. This led to the spread of biased information and propaganda, further polarizing the public and exacerbating the tensions between the parties. The sensationalist nature of reporting sometimes exaggerated or misrepresented issues, amplifying the divisiveness between the parties.
Why did political parties develop so quickly in the American political system?
Frankly, because it is human nature for us to band together into like-minded groups. We seem to seek out similar individuals (however one wishes to define "similar") to bond and group with. Politics is no different than any other area in this respect. In retrospect, any period of ANY government form without some type of political parties should be considered an anomaly. Even in governments with only one political party (or systems which claim not to have any parties), a closer inspection will reveal groups which operate in a manner similar (or even indistinguishable) from a formal political party.
Explain the meaning nature and scope of political sociology?
Political sociology examines the relationship between politics and society, focusing on power dynamics, social structures, and how they influence political behavior and outcomes. It studies topics such as political participation, social movements, inequalities, and institutions, with a broader aim to understand how political processes shape and are shaped by social forces. The scope of political sociology extends to analyzing the impact of politics on individuals, groups, and societies, as well as exploring the distribution of power and resources within political systems.
