I think you could be talking about a Debate
The answer can be found within your AP gov't book Butcher gave you.
The Articles of Confederation
he supported him because they made am
There were many arguments made against the adoption of the United States Constitution. The most widely expressed argument was the fact that a centralized government system could weaken the rights and freedoms of the people throughout the country that the document was intended to provide for.
it was created so blacks could not vote. (as you know many blacks were poor and didn't have enough money to support their families so how in the world could they afford to vote) it was just one of many laws to deprive African Americans of their rights
There were many new arguments made to support slavery. Some argued that slaves were needed so that there would be enough man-power to feed the country.
The federalists made a number of arguments to support the ratification of the constitution. They preferred a strong national government since they believed that if the states had too much power it would result into so many other confederacy governments within the states.
Inititally, before the Constitutional Convention, Roger Sherman wanted to amend the Articles and even wrote some amendments to give Congress more powers. However, upon listening to arguments made by his fellow delegates, he saw the need to abolish the Articles and write a whole new Constitution.
Congress could not negotiate with foreign powers
Production Possibility Frontier
For structural support; you could almost think of it as the plant's skeleton
identify the main arguments made by each author, consider the evidence used to support their claims, evaluate the credibility of the sources cited, and analyze any biases or assumptions present in their arguments.
Most of the arguments were of the civilian deaths and the sickness those bombs brought.
No, made by the Americans.
Those who defended slavery claimed that the economy would be ruined if slavery were to go away. They said that tobacco, rice, and cotton crops would no longer earn a profit for plantation owners in the South.Some even claimed that slavery was natural and used the Bible to back up their arguments.
There are arguments to be made on both sides. However, as yet I have not seen any overwhelming evidence that would support letting the products of this research out into the world.
There are arguments to be made on both sides. However, as yet I have not seen any overwhelming evidence that would support letting the products of this research out into the world.