0
What else can I help you with?
Identify and explain two arguments made by the federalists and explain how the anti-federalists countered each of these arguments?
The answer can be found within your AP gov't book Butcher gave you.
What document made states too powerful?
The Articles of Confederation
Arguments against the adoption of the constitution?
There were many arguments made against the adoption of the United States Constitution. The most widely expressed argument was the fact that a centralized government system could weaken the rights and freedoms of the people throughout the country that the document was intended to provide for.
What are the Articles of Confedaration?
it established the first national government of the united states. Its also like the Constitution, but it was the first "Constitution" made. It is in the Constitution. It was made during the civil war to be the first rules.
Why did Smith support Iaissez faire?
he supported him because they made am
What new argument were made to support slavery?
There were many new arguments made to support slavery. Some argued that slaves were needed so that there would be enough man-power to feed the country.
What arguments did the federalists make to support ratification of the Constitution?
The federalists made a number of arguments to support the ratification of the constitution. They preferred a strong national government since they believed that if the states had too much power it would result into so many other confederacy governments within the states.
Can you provide some simple arguments examples to illustrate the concept?
Arguments are statements supported by reasons or evidence to persuade others to accept a claim. For example, in a debate about the importance of exercise, one simple argument could be: "Regular exercise improves physical health because it strengthens the heart and muscles." Another example could be in a discussion about the benefits of reading: "Reading enhances cognitive abilities as it stimulates the brain and improves vocabulary." These arguments use reasons and evidence to support the claims being made.
Did Roger Sherman want to do away with the Articles of the Confederation?
Inititally, before the Constitutional Convention, Roger Sherman wanted to amend the Articles and even wrote some amendments to give Congress more powers. However, upon listening to arguments made by his fellow delegates, he saw the need to abolish the Articles and write a whole new Constitution.
All what made the national government weak under The Articles of Confederation?
Congress could not negotiate with foreign powers
What is a Representation of the possible ways an economy could use resources?
Production Possibility Frontier
Double-column chart noting especially the arguments you considered most effective and those you found faulty or deceptive What made these arguments powerful or weak Were you more convin?
In evaluating the arguments presented in the double-column chart, I found the use of credible data and expert testimonials to be particularly effective, as they provided a strong foundation for the claims made. Conversely, arguments relying on emotional appeals or anecdotal evidence appeared weak and potentially deceptive, as they lacked empirical support. The powerful arguments were convincing due to their logical coherence and factual backing, while the weaker ones failed to persuade me due to their reliance on subjective experiences rather than solid evidence. Overall, the clarity and reliability of the strongest arguments made a significant impact on my perspective.
Why is cellulose made?
For structural support; you could almost think of it as the plant's skeleton
Was the Articles of Confederation made by theBritish?
No, made by the Americans.
What arguments were made against the atomic bombing in japan?
Most of the arguments were of the civilian deaths and the sickness those bombs brought.
When comparing author's points of view about a subject you should?
identify the main arguments made by each author, consider the evidence used to support their claims, evaluate the credibility of the sources cited, and analyze any biases or assumptions present in their arguments.
What lessons could Vladimer Putin learn from your Articles of Confederation?
Well you can draw similarities with the articles of confederation with what it lacked and how putin managed the Russian country. The articles give limited power to the state which is a problem if its weak, which in russia is how it was then putin came to power and made the government stronger and more powerful.
