Contrary to some Hollywood and Mythical interpretations of the Robin Hood legend, the Normans and Saxons got along rather well, largely due to an intentional arrangement of marriages by William the Conqueror and his allies into Saxon families (and vice versa). We see this today in degree of integration of Norman components in English customs, language and so on. And the rivalry with France that would define much of the history between both countries for centuries to come. The Picts, on the other hand, still want everybody off their island. ---- The Normans were a ruling hierarchy, originally from the same place as the Saxons (Modern-day Denmark) although they had been settled in Normandy for a few hundred years. I don't have the time to go into massive detail about genetics but from what I have read in a book on British geneology I have to warn you not to presume that the Saxons and the Picts were the only people on the island. It fact, the Picts by then were extinct as a race and had been replaced by the Scots (from Ireland, yes I know it's confusing) and the Welsh were different entirely. There were various other cultural influences besides them. To the point. The Normans never really talked to the people below them (i.e. everyone but the Normans) except to give them orders. It was around this time that words like peasant (farmer) and maçon (mason/bricklayer) entered the English language. (This answer is a stub. Feel free to expand it.)
I think it is England .
I think because England didn't really care about that part. England only wanted to rule over them...
I think it's King Philips War???
How did what help the Declaration of Independence...
High on the list I think you could count Elizabeth 1 as a big dislike and the Church of England since she was a Catholic.
I think they never left. Many intermarried with the Normans, and their descendants are all there in the UK.
i think they settled quite well in England
I don't think so because I was told that the Normans created the Motte and Bailey castles. I hope it helps! (Sorry if it doesn't)
We do not trust the Bayeux Tapestry because it was written from a Norman point of view, this means that the Normans could have exaggerated their victory or left out great things that the Saxons did. They did this to make themselves sound greater and more powerful than they actually were. As a result of this, it made viewers think of the Normans as alot better than the Saxons.
because the Normans had taken his fathers land and killed his brother (i think)
the Normans i think :P
I think it was the Saxons
England was an "Anglo-Saxon" kingdom, made up of various peoples from Europe and Scandinavia notably the Angles and the Saxons both Germanic tribes mixed with the remains of the Romans and original Britons/Irish/Pictish tribes.Specifically the last Anglo-Saxon King was Harold Godwinson.
I think it was Christian, I'm not sure though
yess i think lol
true or false did the normans bring the idea of building castles from norway
Most Anglo-Saxons and Celts in England worshipped Christ, by 1066. The Normans who invaded England in 1066 A.D. were also Christians, under the spiritual leadership of the Pope. The last pagan king of England was the Anglo-Saxon Arwald, who died in 686 A.D. The Kings following him were Christians of one kind or another. There were still a few people in England who worshipped the old Druid religions and had other pagan beliefs, but they had almost died out by 1066 A.D. Those beliefs all evolved into rather mild superstitions over time in England.