Wiki User
∙ 8y agoHe thought it shouldn't be Open to the church
Wiki User
∙ 8y agoAccording to Thomas Hobbes, in the state of nature every person had complete liberty. He proposed that the pure state of nature is the natural condition of mankind.
According to Thomas Hobbes, the state of nature or life would be worthless if not protected by the state, while according to Jean-Jacques Rousseau, the state of nature involves men driving towards self-preservation.
Hobbes states that government is essential because it pulls society away from the natural state. Locke disagrees with Hobbesetc.~221BAB
strong nations....
its either 1. a monarch has absolute power 2. the state of nature is a peaceful and harmonious 3. political authority should be shared by the monarch and representatives of the people 4. citizens have a right to revolt. not sure which one of those 4 though.
He thought it shouldn't be Open to the church
There have been many answers to this question, and they differ by philosopher. A good starting point might be to read Locke or Hobbes on the 'State of Nature,' or in Hobbes' case, the 'State of Warre'. This will necessarily lead to more current explorations, but in terms of political science, this is essentially the original argument.
Silver State Legacy was created in 2011.
Hobbes believed people in their natural state were bad;Rousseau believe they were good
Heritage, State, and fellowship are synonym for legacy.
According to Thomas Hobbes, in the state of nature every person had complete liberty. He proposed that the pure state of nature is the natural condition of mankind.
Because Hobbes Locke and Rousseau likes to watch Avatar.
Because Hobbes Locke and Rousseau likes to watch Avatar.
Because Hobbes Locke and Rousseau likes to watch Avatar.
Yes
absolute
hobbes plato aritotle machiavelli