1986 Frasier made a lewd nomination speech full of sexual innuendo. The school district suspended him. The courts upheld the suspension saying the school district had the right of ìin loco parentisî which protects children, especially in a captive audience (those listening to the nomination speech), from explicit, indecent or lewd speech. In loco parentis means in place of the parent. The schools can discipline if behavior creates a material and substantial disruption. This calmed the previous ruling and came down on authority of school district to discipline students.
Bethel School District v. Fraser, 478 US 675 (1986)
The Supreme Court overturned the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Ruling, citing that the school did have the authority to punish students who committed lewd and indecent acts, but not necessarily obscene speech at school assemblies. This is specific to public schools.
Minersville School District v. Gobitis
random drug tests.
entitled to the freedom of expression.
Tinker v. Des Moines, 393 US 503 (1969)None. Tinker v. Des Moines, (1969) was not consolidated with any other cases; however, the US Supreme Court has heard several other cases related to protection of First Amendment speech subsequent to Tinker that has helped defined the constitutional limits of free speech relative to the school environment.Morse v. Frederick, 551 US ___ (2007)The Supreme Court held that the First Amendment does not prohibit schools from punishing students for publishing messages about illegal drugs.Bethel School District No. 403 v. Fraser, 478 US 675 (1986)The Court held that schools may prohibit the use of vulgar and offensive language, that sexualized speech does not enjoy the same protection as political speech.Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier, 484 US 260 (1988)The Court held that public school student newspapers are subject to less First Amendment protection than commercial newspapers, or even student publications established as forums for student expression. Schools may impose restrictions on student newspaper content.
The Tinker, or Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, was a Supreme Court decision. Justice Abe Fortas wrote the majority opinion.
It changed history by changing the kids that were involved and the way that they saw the world and the government
Google the following cases for a good overview of these issues: Tinker v. Des Moines Bethel v. Fraser Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier
Morse v. Frederick, 551 US 393 (2007)(and)Bethel School District v. Fraser, 478 US 675 (1986)Two cases fit the general criteria of this question.Bethel School District v. Fraser, (1986), the earlier case, established that schools may prohibit lewd and vulgar language at student assemblies, even if the speech does not create a disruption.The decision in Morse v. Frederick, (2007) extended school officials' ability to discipline students for violating school speech policies when the Court held a high school principle had not violated a student's civil rights by suspending him for displaying a "Bong Hits 4 Jesus" banner off school property when students gathered to watch the Olympic torch pass through town.For more information, see Related Questions, below.
The school district involved in Engel v. Vitale, (1962) is usually identified in case documents as Union Free School District No. 9, but is more commonly known as Herricks School District. It is located in Hyde Park, western Nassau County, New York.Case Citation:Engel v. Vitale, 370 US 421 (1962)
They decided that segregating Mexican Americans into separate schools was unconstitutional.
Forcing Mexican Americans to attend separate schools from whites was unconstitutional.
The Santa Fe Independent School District V Doe was in Texan,USA
It depends on the context. If you were to use it like: "I am in the wrong school district." then it would not. But if you said: "School District 957 needs to be widened." then it would. So if it is a title, yes; and if it is just a noun, no.
No.
State courts in both Mendez v. Westminster School District and Delgado v. Bastrop Independent School District ruled that segregating Mexican American and Mexican students into separate schools violated their rights under the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. These decisions played a significant role in laying the groundwork for the eventual Brown v. Board of Education case challenging racial segregation in schools.
Minersville School District v. Gobitis
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklenburg School District in April 1971