0
What else can I help you with?
Is there such a thing as a STRAWMAN?
A strawman is a legal fiction. It is not a real person, but a fake entity used in some real estate transactions.
What do liberals believe government should be?
Government, according to modern Liberals, should redistribute the assets of the wealthy to support the majority. They are as those who wanted more eggs from the golden goose and opened it up thus killing the source. Liberalism is couched in good feelings and generosity with the assets of others.Government should regulate and provide for all aspects of human life from the cradle to the grave. Government should decide who lives and who dies and when. Government should prevent individuals from owning property and goods. Everything should be owned by the government. No one should be permitted to enjoy the fruit of his labors because he would have more than others. This would be an inequality.The natural consequence of such a government will be the reduction of everyone to the same standard of living and the elimination of any personal motivation to excel in business.Everyone will be an employee of the government. No one will be free.In effect, it is a return to feudalism, where the government is the king.Nice try, but that's a strawman argument.Modern Liberals (and, I speak in world-wide terms as to what a Liberal is, not the mutant distorted view of a Liberal that seems to have taken hold in the U.S.A.) generally believe in these fundamental concepts:Capitalism is the proper form of economic theoryHowever, Capitalism has significant failings when attempting to build a societyTo fix failings of the Capitalist economic theory in society, ideas from Socialism can be applied.This fusion of Capitalist economic ideas with Socialist social society ideas is the primary definition of a modern Liberal.Practically speaking, this means that a Liberal espouses many (though likely not all) of the following ideals:As it is impossible for each citizen to start out life on a truly even level, societal justice (harmony, happiness, etc.) demand that society manage some level of wealth redistribution, where the more fortunate subsidize those less able to provide for themselves.It is the responsibility of society (in the guise of government) to provide a minimum standard of living to all citizens. This may or may not include items such a public heathcare, housing provisions, retirement funds, etc.Those who have more than others should be expected to proportionally contribute more to society as a whole. This does NOT mean that everyone should have the same level of income or wealth. It is most evident in having a Progressive tax system (where the percentage of taxation increases with income)Government should help protect citizens from events beyond their (reasonable) control - that is, provide a social "safety net" to cushion the blows that chance may deal out. Examples of this would be Disaster Relief programs, Job Retraining, Unemployment Insurance.Individuals should be rewarded for industriousness and therefore be able to benefit from the fruits of their labors, though government may chose to restrict certain economic activities as harmful to the society as a whole (even though certain individuals might benefit greatly).Government is responsible for managing the country's resources in a manner most beneficial to society as a whole and for the long-term, and should have the power to regulate private use of common shared resources.Justice (in the legal systems) should not be dependent on wealth or stationJustice should be about the Spirit of the law, and take into account all circumstances surrounding the crime, both positive and negative, and should be applied as evenly as possible.As Justice is imperfect, and as capital punishment is an irreversible act, the state should not be permitted to commit an irreversible act on imperfect evidence. Therefore, capital punishment is immoral and impermissible.As future generations are important, and the family unit provides considerable social stability and other benefits, families should be supported and encouraged. This may include items such as paid family leave, subsidies for having children (including tax breaks), free daycare, etc.Any specific Religion should have no role in defining societal morals. In particular, moral behavior is an individual's right to determine for themselves, so long as it does not impinge on another's right to determine their own morals. Legality and morality (or, ethics vs morals) are distinct. Most specifically, government should NEVER be in the business of defining morality.Religion should not have any influence in government, other than informing an individual's choice of morality.Certain industries or services are inherently a "natural monopoly", and as such, should either be heavily regulated or government-owned so as to provide the best societal benefit (not the maximum profit). For example: power distribution, roadways, water supplies, etc.There are plenty of other examples, but the main thrust behind Liberalism is twofold: societal justice and harmony through some level of weath redistribution to soften the problems that random chance has on the society, and individual choice in determining their own personal behavior so long as that behavior does not significantly impact social justice and harmony.
Is there such a thing as a STRAWMAN?
A strawman is a legal fiction. It is not a real person, but a fake entity used in some real estate transactions.
What is a strawman diagram?
the one the gov gets money for
What is the meaning of a strawman strategy?
Well, darling, a strawman strategy is when someone distorts or exaggerates their opponent's argument to make it easier to attack. It's like fighting a scarecrow instead of a real person - easy peasy lemon squeezy. Just remember, using a strawman won't make you look smarter, just sneakier.
Does the strawman thing really work?
No, it is a complete fallacy. It is false in the entirety.
How do you get your strawman name back?
To reclaim your strawman name, you typically need to follow a legal process that involves filing specific documents with the appropriate government agency, such as a court or the Secretary of State. This often includes proving your identity and demonstrating your connection to the strawman name. It's also advisable to consult legal resources or professionals who specialize in this area to navigate the complexities involved. Keep in mind that the concept of a "strawman" name is often associated with various legal theories that may not be widely recognized or accepted.
How does a felon get a firearm illegally?
Theft, black market purchases, strawman purchases.
How do you control strawman?
To control a strawman argument, it's crucial to clarify your position first and ensure that your opponent understands it accurately. When addressing a strawman, gently point out the misrepresentation and restate your original argument. This helps refocus the discussion on the actual issues at hand, promoting a more productive dialogue. Lastly, maintain a respectful tone to encourage constructive conversation rather than escalating conflict.
What actors and actresses appeared in Strawman - 2011?
The cast of Strawman - 2011 includes: Jennifer Bigham as Becky Branton Ellerbee as Ian Juli Erickson as Woman on Park Bench Desiree Medellin as Yoga Girl Heather Sims as Olivia
What is straw man rhetorical device?
strawman- this reporter is taking abortion and makingmore of an issue with it.
How do you Separate Yourself From What if your Strawman and Profit?
To separate yourself from the "what if" scenarios and the concept of a strawman argument, focus on grounding your thoughts in reality and facts. A strawman argument misrepresents a position to make it easier to attack, so clarify your own beliefs and values. Analyze potential outcomes logically instead of getting lost in hypothetical fears. By prioritizing evidence-based reasoning and self-awareness, you can maintain clarity and focus on your true goals.
What would strawman mean for someone going to court facing prison time?
As I understand it, a strawman is like the "front" guy for the illegal activities of another. He takes the wrap and can end up doing time for charges that should be made against the actual perp.
Can i file a ucc -1 agreement for my strawman?
Yes, you can file a UCC-1 financing statement to assert a security interest in your strawman, which is often referred to in certain legal theories regarding personal sovereignty. However, it's important to note that the concept of a strawman is not recognized in mainstream law, and such filings may not have any legal effect. Additionally, misuse of UCC filings can lead to legal complications. It is advisable to consult with a legal professional before proceeding.
