answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The US Constitution is the framework of government. It gives the government powers and the people rights. If any legislation violates the rights of the people or exceeds the powers of government, it can be struck down by the Supreme Court under the doctrine of judicial review.

For more information, see Related Questions, below.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

There is no such principle. Only the President can veto a bill, or prevent it from passing into law (unless the veto is overriden by a two-thirds majority vote of each house of Congress).

The US Supreme Court can use the power of judicial reviewto nullify an unconstitutional law, treaty or executive order if it is part of a case the Court is reviewing under its appellate jurisdiction.

Veto power is exercised before a bill becomes law; judicial review is exercised after a bill becomes law, but only if the law is challenged as part of a case or controversy being heard by the Supreme Court.

For more information, see Related Questions, below.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

The Principal of Judicial Review.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What is a principle allowing the supreme court to strike down laws as unconstitutional?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What can the Supreme court do if a law is unconstitutional?

Strike it down


What can a supreme court do if a law is unconstitutional?

Strike it down


What is one way the Supreme Court check the Senate?

the supreme court can declare laws unconstitutional


Can the Supreme Court declared any law unconstitutional?

As long as the majority of the court agrees that the law does, in fact, violate the US Constitution, they can declare it unconstitutional and strike it down.


Can any supreme court declare any law unconstitutional?

As long as the majority of the court agrees that the law does, in fact, violate the US Constitution, they can declare it unconstitutional and strike it down.


On what grounds can the US Supreme Court strike down state or federal law?

The US Supreme Court can nullify laws that are unconstitutional, but only if the law is appropriately challenged by a person or entity with standing.


What chief justice marshall decision in the case of marbury v. Madison?

Marshall used the case of Marbury v. Madison to establish the principle of judicial review, the authority of the Supreme Court to strike down unconstitutional laws. Today, judicial review remains one of the most important powers of the Supreme Court.


What was Chief Justice Marshall's decision in case of Marbury v Madison?

Marshall used the case of Marbury v. Madison to establish the principle of judicial review, the authority of the Supreme Court to strike down unconstitutional laws. Today, judicial review remains one of the most important powers of the Supreme Court.


What happens if a law passes that takes away a right guaranteed by the bill of rights?

The Supreme Court would strike it down as being unconstitutional.


What was Chief Justice Marshalls decision in the case of Marbury v. Madison?

Marshall used the case of Marbury v. Madison to establish the principle of judicial review, the authority of the Supreme Court to strike down unconstitutional laws. Today, judicial review remains one of the most important powers of the Supreme Court.


Why did the California Supreme Court strike down Proposition 8?

The Court said that Proposition 8 was unconstitutional because it violated the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment. That decision is currently under review by the US Supreme Court.


Did the supreme court strike down the AAA and NIRA as unconstitutional?

Yes, the Supreme Court struck down the AAA (Agricultural Adjustment Act) and the NIRA (National Industrial Recovery Act) as unconstitutional in separate cases. In 1936, the Court ruled that the AAA violated the Constitution by regulating agricultural production, and in 1935, it declared the NIRA unconstitutional for giving the executive branch excessive power.