The example of this cabinet is the Government States
Presidential address
No, because it has nothing to do with the relative power and jurisdiction between state and federal government. The Senate approving a presidential appointment is an example of the system of "checks and balances" in our federal government. Requiring Senate approval of presidential appointments, prevents the executive branch of government from having too much power over who shall be judges, ambassadors and other federal officials.
the head of government is directly elected by people
A hybrid system of government is one that is lead partially by a presidential system and partially by a parliamentary system. This is also known as a semi-presidential system of government.
The US government.
The example of this cabinet is the Government States
Presidential address
an example is: the presidential suite was huge sorry that's all i could come up with
Brazil
Panama has a presidential democratic government.
no
The presidential form of government is advantageous because the people get to decide the rules. Presidential forms of government also gives anyone the right to run for president.
One thing about presidential government that is better than parliamentary government is how the leader is chosen. In a presidential government the people choose their leader. This gives the people more say in their country and who governs it.
The characteristics of a Presidential system of government include a person who is the head of state and the head of the executive branch of government.
In a presidential government, the president is both chief executive and head of state.
A key difference between a parliamentary government and a presidential government lies in the structure of executive power. In a parliamentary system, the executive branch is led by a prime minister who is chosen from the legislative branch, while in a presidential system, the president is elected separately from the legislature and holds both ceremonial and executive powers. Additionally, parliamentary systems often allow for more flexibility in government formation and dissolution through votes of no confidence, whereas presidential systems have fixed terms for the executive leader.