Korematsu v. United States
Strict scrutiny
Women do not qualify as a "discrete and insular minority".
Compelling State Interest is an article. This article is argues about strict scrutiny and equal protection cases.
the most rigorous test to which a legal classification can be put. a test that very few laws will be able to pass. usually used when laws concern grouping by race or ethnicity.
strict scrutiny
Strict scrutiny is very critical observation or examination.
All of the above are true
Strict scrutiny
Almost every law that comes under strict scrutiny has been reversed, and almost every law that has come under rational scrutiny has been upheld. The different levels of scrutiny define the different standards the state law must pass. For a law to pass strict scrutiny, it must be narrowly tailored and least restrictive and the state must have a compelling state interest for its enactment. For a law to pass rational scrutiny, it must be rational (the law can be over-inclusive and under-inclusive) and the state has to show that it was accomplished legally. The state only has to show that the reason for its enactment is legitimate. The burden of proof also shifts from the defendant in rational scrutiny to the state in strict scrutiny.
strict scrutiny
strict scrutiny
Strict scrutiny
Korematsu v. United States
Rational basis test for economic issues, strict scrutiny test for racial and fundamental liberty issues, and midlevel scrutiny for gender issues
Strict scrutiny test
The strict scrutiny test.