Equal representation means each region or state is represented by the same number of elected representatives. Proportional representation, on the other hand, means that the number of seats won by a party is proportionate to the received number of votes.
Chat with our AI personalities
Equal representation ensures that each individual or group has the same number of representatives, regardless of population size. Proportional representation, on the other hand, allocates seats based on the proportion of votes received by each party or group. In proportional representation, larger groups receive more seats, while in equal representation, all groups are treated equally in terms of representation.
Oh, dude, it's like this - equal representation is when everyone gets the same number of seats, like a kindergarten class sharing crayons. Proportional representation is more like a potluck dinner where everyone brings a dish based on how many people they're representing. So, one's all about fairness in numbers, and the other's about sharing the workload. Cool, right?
Ah, what a lovely question! Equal representation means that each person or group has the same number of representatives, ensuring fairness. Proportional representation, on the other hand, aims to reflect the percentage of votes each party receives, giving more accurate representation of the people's choices. Both are beautiful ways to make sure everyone's voice is heard and valued.
Equal representation is where every state or province get the same amount of Member's of Parliament for example PEI would get the same number of MP's as Ontario and Representation by population AKA Rep by Pop is where for example you would get 1 Mp for every 35,000 people that means PEI would get about 4 and Ontario would get about 8 or 9
The representation of states in the United States Senate is based on equal representation. Every state, regardless of size, elects two senators; in contrast, the number of seats a state has in the House of Representatives is based on that state's population. This difference arose out of the conflict between the Virginia Plan and the New Jersey Plan put forth at the Philadelphia Convention. The Virginia Plan proposed that representation in the legislature be based on either a state's population or its monetary contribution to the federal government, whereas the New Jersey Plan proposed an equal distribution of seats in the legislature to all states. The agreed upon compromise between these two plans, called the Connecticut Compromise, established two houses: the House of Representatives, based on proportional representation, and the Senate, based on equal representation.
It solved the problem of representation in congress because the house of representatives was based on proportional representation (# of representatives based on population) which made the larger states happy and the Senate was based on equal representation (each state got two representatives) which made the small states happy. So each state was represented.
By making representation in the House of Representatives proportionate to population and representation in the Senate equal for each state
The New Jersey plan had one house based on equal representation of each state while the Virginia plan had two houses based on the states population.
It is based on equal representation for each state.