My opponent is a threat to your safety and your children
A king forces farmers to send him most of their crops to be distributed among wealthy nobles.
Which appeal is the best example of pathos?
the bill of rights
jean jacque rousseau
The political would have more strength int the government.
A king forces farmers to send him most of their crops to be distributed among wealthy nobles.
Which appeal is the best example of pathos?
John Locke .
The Two Treatises of Government is a work of political philosophy published anonymously in 1689 by John Locke.
Oh, dude, that would be John Locke. He's like the OG of natural rights and stuff. He was all about life, liberty, and property, you know, the essentials for a chill existence. So yeah, Locke was all about people having the right to do their thing without someone harshing their vibe.
A leader gives up power when a majority of her country's citizens disapprove of her policies
John Locke would likely appreciate how Thomas Jefferson draws upon his ideas in the Declaration of Independence, particularly the emphasis on natural rights and the social contract. Jefferson's assertion that all men are created equal and possess unalienable rights aligns closely with Locke's philosophy on individual liberty and government by consent. Additionally, Jefferson's call for the right to revolt against oppressive governments mirrors Locke's views on the legitimacy of resistance when rights are infringed. Overall, Locke would see Jefferson's work as a practical application of his political theories.
Anything that would put you in danger is unacceptable - like running around and playing and cutting up and not following directions.
freedom of assembly
freedom of assembly
Preston Brooks was a congressman known for his violent attack on Senator Charles Sumner in 1856, which many viewed as an extreme response to political disagreement. While some contemporaries praised Brooks for defending Southern honor, others condemned his actions as an unacceptable breach of civility and decorum in political discourse. Ultimately, whether his punishment was reasonable depends on one's perspective on the appropriate limits of political expression and violence. In a modern context, however, such behavior would likely be deemed wholly unacceptable.
What Would John Locke Do