answersLogoWhite

0

Illinois v. Allen :: 397 U.S. 337 (1970) It basically means a defendant has a right to be present during a trial, as per Constitutional rights, unless the defendant is disruptive. Then, the person can be removed and the trial go on without the person there.

User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What is Disposed Proceeding As Ex Parte?

An Ex Parte hearing is a judicial hearing without one of the opposing parties being present."Disposed proceeding as exparte" means that a hearing was held to give the opportunity to the defendant to attend but the defendant did not attend. Therefore, the proceeding can continue "ex parte."


How would you use defendant in a sentence?

The judge asked, "Has the jury reached a decision about the guilt or innocence of this defendant?"


What are grounds for dismissing a public defender and how do you go about doing it?

A defendant is not obligated to take the services of the public defender. If a defendant wishes to hire private counsel, he has that right, or if he wishes to defend himself, he has that right. If the defendant wishes to defend himself, the judge will inquire as to if the decision is knowing and voluntary, and if so, will allow the defendant to do so. It is a very important decision, and not one to be made lightly.


Can a victim help the defendant in a legal case?

Yes, a victim can choose to help the defendant in a legal case by providing information or testimony that may support the defendant's case. However, it is important to note that the victim's decision to help the defendant is voluntary and not required.


What is unjust dismissal?

If the Plaintiff or the Prosecutor disagreed with the judge's decision to dismiss the charges against the plaintiff/defendant, they might characterize the judge's decision as "unjust" meaning they did not agree with the judge's legal reasoning for doing so. OR -- in an employment situation -- it might refer to the dismissal of an empolyee under conditions that were not according to prevailing law or procedure.


What is the difference between a policy and a procedure?

A policy is a set of principles or rules established by an organization to guide decision-making and behavior. A procedure, on the other hand, is a series of steps or actions to be followed in a specific order to achieve a particular outcome. In simple terms, policies outline what should be done, while procedures detail how it should be done.


Use controlling in a sentence?

A legal precedent is called "controlling" in a court proceeding if the precedent is a decision rendered by a court to which any judgment of the court in which the proceeding is occurring can be appealed, either immediately or ultimately.


The decision procedure that empowers a subordinate the most is?

Delegation


Which of these is an example of an out-of-court settlement?

The plaintiff and the defendant make an agreement before the decision in made in court.


Why does the defendant have to stand when the decision is announced?

It is customary, and it is done out of respect to the jury and/or judge who renders the judgement.


What is an absolvitor?

An absolvitor is a decision or decree in law made by a court in favour of the defendant in a given action.


What type of decision that can made by following a definite procedure?

If a tried, tested and definite procedure is carefully followed, the decision finally reached, would be expected to be the correct one.