because...
This is perhaps the best question I have had the pleasure of answering since I began answering questions on Wikianswers. All just laws conform with nature. Gravity is a law and it conforms with nature. The laws that any given society will legislate are not all natural laws, far too many are positive laws (man made laws) and can become part of the problem they were intended to handle. Positive laws are not just laws, no matter how just they may appear. By the virtue of being a man made law as opposed to a discovered law is what makes these laws unjust. All laws discovered to be natural laws are just laws because they seek to protect the rights of the individual. It is that simple really. Murder is an abrogation and derogation of someones rights, there fore murder is wrong. Theft is an abrogation and derogation of someones rights and thus it is wrong. Prohibition of alcohol or prostitution are not just laws because they do not seek to protect the rights of the individual and quite clearly ignore certain rights in order to claim any legitimacy. Laws that attempt to prevent natural human behavior are unjust laws. Most people in the United States today would agree that any attempt to legislate against dancing would be an unjust law. In spite of that, there are multitudes of laws that function in the very same way that an anti-dancing law would and blatantly disregard the rights of the people.
Thomas Jefferson wrote the Declaration of Independence during the Enlightenment Age. During this time, peoples were not changing their beliefs, but they were changing their attitudes. After you read paragraph one, you should notice that he mentions "Powers of the earth" which are the stars, moon, sun, trees, etc., and he mentions "Laws of Nature" which are laws that are entitled to men by God. So the answer to your question would be science and reason.
It is not a guide at all. It is the basic set of rules and Laws that tell how the Government may continue to create laws and enforce them. It is not a guide!!
Scientific Experiments can be traced back to the enlightenment because Ben Franklin, a famous American Enlightenment Figure, conducted these experiments to discover the laws of nature. Questioning authority (respectfully) for better reasoning can be traced back to the Great Awakening because it was brought forth after the Great Awakening took place.
Scientific laws cannot normally tell you the answer to the questions that start with "WHY?". For example, "Why are we here?".
Nature is about change. It has no memory and is constantly creating the new. To learn in detail exactly how nature works in specific ways, people have studied and developed and expanded upon the physical sciences (biology, chemistry, and physics)
Scientific laws are absolutes, they are unchanged by the nature of the observer. Societal laws are a product of the community - generally a consensus in a particular community, but a different community may have a quite different set of community laws.
a scientific theorie is the explanashon of of things or events based on mant observashons.a scientific law is a description of of nature based on many observations.
Scientific law
Two ways that physical laws are different from other laws is that physical variants are of a scientific nature and are applicable to a class of phenomena.
Scientific laws. Scientific laws. Scientific laws. Scientific laws.
Scientific laws describe observable patterns in nature and are based on empirical evidence. While new evidence or observations can lead to revisions or refinements in scientific laws, they do not change arbitrarily. Changes in scientific understanding are based on rigorous testing and verification, ensuring that any updates to laws reflect a more accurate representation of how the natural world works.
Scientific theories and laws both aim to describe observed events in nature, but they do so in different ways. Theories are more comprehensive explanations that incorporate multiple observations and can evolve as new evidence arises. Laws, on the other hand, are more focused descriptions of specific relationships or patterns in nature that are observed consistently.
Scientific laws describe regular patterns or relationships in nature, but they do not explain why these patterns occur. Laws are empirical generalizations based on repeated observations and experiments. Theories are what provide the explanatory framework for why these patterns or relationships exist.
In scientific theory, a rule of nature is a fundamental principle that describes how the natural world behaves consistently under certain conditions. These rules are based on observations, experimentation, and mathematical models that help explain and predict natural phenomena. Examples of rules of nature include Newton's laws of motion, the law of gravity, and the laws of thermodynamics.
The main similarity between scientific theories and scientific laws is that both are supported by extensive evidence and are used to explain natural phenomena. However, theories are broader explanations that can be modified or refined based on new evidence, while laws are specific statements that describe a consistent pattern observed in nature.