0
Verified answer
What was the most important cause behind urban decay during the post war years?
the movement of population to the suburbs
After world war 2 what happened to the population in the cities and suburbs?
the answer is increased
What enabled middle and upper class people to move to the suburbs?
The spread of mass transit from the city to the suburbs.People rode streetcars to the city to work, shop, and be entertained, and returned to their homes in the suburbs in the evening.
What are the main causes of diversity?
Erections
How did suburban living make owning a car a necessity?
I think the first key to answering this question is understanding what the suburbs are. Most people consider themselves to either live in the city, or outside the city (the suburbs). The suburbs are usually less populated regions that do not contain the city life including lots of commercial buildings, big populations, and public transportation. In the city, most people could survive on public transportation. Nowadays, most cities have all sorts of transportation including buses, trains, subways, and taxi services. However, in the suburbs, there aren't as many public transportation. Hence living in the suburbs is pretty much a necessity to owning a car, unless you are comfortable walking, riding a bike, or any other means.
What was a cause of the limited diversity in the suburbs?
African Americans were not allowed in many suburbs which caused limited diversity.
Suburbs tended to have what?
little diversity
What did suburbs tended to have?
little diversity
Suburbs tended to have?
little diversity
What was cause of the limited diversity in the suburbs?
Suburbs generally were developed all at once with all the houses built by a single builder or company. Unlike the urban core which evolved over time, with houses built by different builders. As a result, all the houses in a suburban area are similar in age, size and cost. This resulted in people of the same economic background living together in these neighborhoods. And while these neighborhoods were (and still are not) diverse, it was often as much about Economics as it was about racism. Certainly many suburbs, particularly between 1950 and 1970, were developed outside of the central city around new schools for white homeowners that were fleeing the integration of established schools. But just because someone moved out of neighborhood with an integrated school to a suburban one with no diversity does not mean it was motivated by racism. Without doubt, many people moved to get away from diversity, but many moved to give the best opportunity to their children as well.
Historically the growth of north American suburbs was most constrained by?
Limited transportation
What was the cause of limited diversity in the suburbs?
Limited diversity in the suburbs can be attributed to historical housing policies like redlining, discriminatory lending practices, and social segregation. These factors have contributed to racial and economic segregation, with certain groups being marginalized or excluded from suburban neighborhoods. Additionally, social networks and personal preferences can also play a role in limiting diversity in suburban areas.
Why do people hate the suburbs?
I hate the suburbs because I lacks the diversity ,culture,and accessibility city has to offer. I personally find myself uncomfortable in the suburbs and somewhat trapped there. Plus In the city it's easier to joke about than murder than in suburbia for some reason. (I can't figure why?)
What does Ignoring diversity cause?
Ignoring diversity can lead to lack of inclusivity, limited perspectives, and perpetuation of biases and discrimination. It hinders growth, innovation, and the well-being of individuals and society as a whole.
What was the most important cause behind urban decay during the post war years?
the movement of population to the suburbs
How do the two quotations differ in their perspective on suburbs answers?
One quotation may view suburbs positively, highlighting the comfort and safety they provide, whereas the other may criticize suburbs for their homogeneity and lack of diversity. The different perspectives reflect varying opinions on the social, cultural, and environmental aspects of suburban living.
Life in the suburbs during the 1950's was better then life in the suburbs today?
Opinions on this topic vary widely. Some may argue that life in the 1950s suburbs had a sense of community and simpler lifestyle that is missing in today's suburbs, while others may appreciate the modern amenities and diversity found in today's suburban areas. Both time periods have their own unique challenges and benefits.
