answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The Federalists were the ones whom wanted to aprove the constitution, and make it legal. The Antifederalists were the one whom voted againt aproving the constituition. The Federalists were the ones whom wanted to aprove the constitution, and make it legal. The Antifederalists were the one whom voted againt aproving the constituition.

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What was the role of Federalists and Antifederalists in the radification process?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about American Government

A strong role for federal courts was generally supported by?

Federalists


How did federalists and anti federalists view the role of the federal government differently and how did they feel about the constitution as a result?

Federalists believed in a strong central government. Obviously, the anti-federalists believed the very opposite. Some federalists might not have been completely satisfied with the US Constitution, but nobody really could be. The anti-federalists were very displeased with the US Constitution, though.


What is formal role of the judicial branch in amending the constitution (apex)?

It has no formal role in the process.


What is the senat's role in the appointment process?

The majority of senators present and vote for confirmation.


Why did the founding father include the bill of rights with the constitution?

Once the delegates at the Constitutional Convention agreed on the need to compose a Constitution, problems began to arise. Northern and Southern states disagreed about the nature and presence of slavery. Larger states with more population and smaller states with smaller populations disagreed about the nature of representation. The largest issue which caused the greatest amount of inertia concerned about the role of federal government in the life of its citizens. Federalists wanted a strong national government so that a sense of law and order and basic functionality can be present in the new nation. Arising out of the terrible reality of Shays' Rebellion as well as the high level of futility featured within the first Constitution called the Articles of Confederation, the Federalists, such as John Jay and Alexander Hamilton, were fairly pronounced on the issue of a strong federal governmental body. At the same time, the antifederalists, consisting of individuals like Patrick Henry and George Mason, felt that emboldening the federal government without some measure of individual freedom to act as a check against the authority would be a repeat of the tyranny featured with King George of Britain. The Bill of Rights was the compromise that pleased both sides. Federalists were happy because the federal government would retain its power to govern the nation effectively and properly. The Antifederalists were happy because the Bill of Rights became the first 10 amendments to the Constitution, and demanded that while federal government possessed power, it did not come at the cost of individual rights.

Related questions

A strong role for federal courts was generally supported by?

Federalists


How did the federalists and the republicans view the role of ordinary people in the government?

The representatives said that the elected officials ruled in the people's name. (the Federalists also agreed with that)


How does perspective play a role in the Declaration of Independence?

Perspective played a major role in the Declaration of Independence because of the different ways people interpret it's content. Just like with the Constitution, how there were the Federalists who adhered strictly to the Constitution word for word and the Antifederalists who thought it was up for interpretation, the Declaration of Independence is the same way. Whether you interpret it strictly or loosely determines how you view what rights the forefathers of the U.S. really wrote in for us to be granted.


How did federalists and anti federalists view the role of the federal government differently and how did they feel about the constitution as a result?

Federalists believed in a strong central government. Obviously, the anti-federalists believed the very opposite. Some federalists might not have been completely satisfied with the US Constitution, but nobody really could be. The anti-federalists were very displeased with the US Constitution, though.


What is the role of process executive?

what is the role of process executive?


How did the federalists and the republicans view the role of the ordinary people in the government?

The representatives said that the elected officials ruled in the people's name. (the Federalists also agreed with that)


How did Thomas Jefferson and the Democratic Republicans view the role of the central government differently from Alexander Hamilton and the Federalists?

Hi what the heck


How do you explain the role of science in production process?

explain the role of science inproduction process


What is the role of operations manager in transformation process?

1. role of the operations manager in the transformation process.


How did republicans view the role of ordinary people in government?

The representatives said that the elected officials ruled in the people's name. (the Federalists also agreed with that)


What is the role of noise in communication process?

the process of others hearing you!


What is the difference between federalist and anti federalist?

There were many, but it can be summarized as such: Federalists believed in a stronger centralized government and that the states were essentially part of one union that could enact laws upon all states. This party was primarily driven by Alexander Hamilton who correctly saw the need for this to happen from a economic stand-point, to pay off America's early debt and to establish a unified currency. The Anti-Federalists believed in strong states rights and a very minimalist federal government for many reasons. One such was a rational fear that a central government's president might be thought of as a King; whom they had just fought a revolutionary war against. Eventually the less-popular Federalists lost their power and for a period of time America had a one-party system within the Anti-Federalist party called the Democrat Republicans.