Allowed a slave to count as Three-Fifths of a person
The compromise that was reached over the issue of slave trade was "Three-Fifths Compromise's.
The three-fifths compromise was necessary in order to gain the support of both the Northern and Southern states for how slaves would be counted for the purpose of apportioning representation in the U.S. House of Representatives. Taxation was also affected by this apportionment but the main issue was representation. If slaves were counted as a whole person, the South would have a larger representation; if slaves didn't count at all, the North would have a larger representation. So to satisfy each side, the Constitution stated that slaves would be counted as 3/5ths of a person; a compromise between the two extremes.
The Three Fifths Compromise solved the problem of how population should be counted in slave states in terms of representation in Congress as well as tax purposes. Since black slaves made up a significant part of the population in the southern states, and they did not have the right to vote, it was declared that the slaves would represent three fifths of a white person. Short answer: allowed the slaves states to count a slave as three fifths of a person
Slaves were counted by population by three-fifths of a person.
It was not the Great Comprimise, or my wiener. So it must be the three fifths comprimise.
Slavery was preserved with counting the slaves as only 3/5 of a person.
The Three Fifths Compromise is one of the most controversial parts and outcomes of the Constitutional Convention. For the allocation of seats in the US House of Representatives, a black person counts for three fifths of a white person.
The only thing that could save the Convention from failure was compromise.
minus three fifths
Assuming that you mean "fifths", the answer is three fifths.
six and three fifths
two fifths
Three fifths of fifty is 30.
Three fifths of a hundred is sixty.
Three fifths is larger than three eighths
three fifths is bigger.