There were disagreements on almost everything. It was all settled by compromise and a last minute rush to get a document together. The delegates argued over slavery, number of representatives each state would have, the powers of the President, a Bill of Rights, power of the states. There was little agreement on anything except that the Articles of Confederation were inadequate.
the major division was between those who wanted to amend or revise the articles of confederation and the second could be the election of George Washington for president.
African Americans had not interest in becoming delegates for state constitutional conventions.
popular sovereignty
called for the ending of the slave trade in 1808.
Illinois and Maryland are two states with state presidential conventions. Also, New York, Missouri, and the state of California have state presidential conventions.
because they could never agree on anything. so they had to all have at least 9 votes per states and then get things done that way. otherwise there would be no bill of rights if we do/have not had constitutional conventions?
yes
There were two conventions so we need to know which one.
George Washington
African Americans had not interest in becoming delegates for state constitutional conventions.
Prior to America gaining full independence from England there were two constitutional conventions held. The first one was called by James Madison and Alexander Hamilton.
Constitutional Convention
to correct problems of the artcles of confederation
James McClurg
David Loyd Pulliam has written: 'The constitutional conventions of Virginia from the foundation of the commonwealth to the present time' -- subject(s): Biography, Constitutional conventions
One controversial issue in the Constitutional Conventions of the1890s was the location of the federal capital How was this issue resolved?
During the constitutional conventions of the 1890's
During the constitutional conventions of 1897-1898