What word best fits Beveridge's views in his speech A Racism harsh treatment of Asians B Abolitionism freedom for Filipinos C Generosity send the Filipinos money D Christianity send more missionaries?

How are the differences between universalizing and ethnic religions similar to the differences between folk and popular culture?

A universal religion is one that has adherents around the globe. Ethnic religions are usually those limited to a certain geographic location whose followers are a specific people (ethnicity).

What were the reactions to the sugar act?

They were very upset that the colonists did not appreciate their generosity. It was only passed to defend the colonial borders and it was not used for the British benefit. Many people wrongly believe that it was used for their own benefit. If you are doing this for a school project, this is the correct answer.

How did the supreme court in the 1870s and 1880s undermined republican reconstruction?

After the Civil War, Americans faced the difficult problem of how to reconstruct both the Union and the individual southern states. Despite significant opposition on the part of northern Democrats aided by andrew-johnson, who succeeded abrahamabraham-lincoln, the Republican party was able to maintain control of the national government. Republicans were deeply committed to protecting the basic rights of the newly freed slaves and of white southern unionists. Closely related was a determination that unreconstructed Confederates not be permitted to resume control of the southern states. But these commitments had to be reconciled with the general desire for a speedy restoration of the Union, for generosity to rebels who demonstrated renewed loyalty, and for the maintenance of a balanced federal system.Republicans determined to establish a program to secure these goals before they restored southern states to normal relations in the Union. Ultimately, Congress passed a Reconstruction Act (1867) that declared the Johnson‐authorized governments provisional and placed them under military authority until Congress recognized new governments to be established by constitutional conventions and subsequent elections.These decisions raised the profound constitutional question of the status of the southern states and people upon the close of the war. White Southerners, northern Democrats, and President Johnson were convinced that Republicans were abrogating the rights of the southern states and unconstitutionally subjecting the southern people to military government. As northern Democrats and Johnson lost the political struggle to the Republicans, white southerners appealed to the Supreme Court.They had some hope of success, because in Ex parteex-parte-milligan(1866) five of the justices opined that Congress could suspend the privilege of habeas-corpus-6corpus and authorize military-trials-and-martial-lawtrials-a key element of military supervision of the South-only when ordinary courts were closed by invasion or insurrection. Moreover, in cummings-v-missouriv. Missouri (1867) and Ex parte Garland (1867) the justices by 5‐to‐4 margins had signaled their distaste for the Republican program by ruling that test-oathsoathscould not be used to bar former rebels from practicing their professions. The "test oath" laws made the ability to take an oath of past loyalty a test for admission to the bar, clergy, or other influential professions.These decisions led to charges that the Court was continuing its old proslavery ways. Leading Republicans in Congress proposed to strip the Court of the power to review national laws or to require two‐thirds majorities to rule federal laws unconstitutional. But in http://www.answers.com/topic/mississippi-v-johnson(1867) and Georgia v. Stanton (1868), the Court refused requests from the Johnson‐organized state governments for injunctions-and-equitable-remediesrestraining the president and his secretary of war from enforcing the Reconstruction Acts (see judicial-review).The Court exercised judicial-self-restraintrestraint again in Ex parte ex-parte-mccardle(1869), in which southerners challenged the Reconstruction Act's provision for military trials and the constitutionality of the Reconstruction Act in general. Although several justices wanted to speed the decision, the majority refused, allowing Congress to repeal the legal provision under which the case had been brought. The Court then agreed that the repeal had destroyed its jurisdiction, even though the case had been pending.The Court's discretion helped to restore its moral authority as a neutral expositor of law. But despite their concerns, most Republicans never intended to attack the Court as an institution. On the contrary, they recognized that it would be a crucial instrument for carrying out their program to provide federal protection for civil and political rights.

What do liberals believe government should be?

Government, according to modern Liberals, should redistribute the assets of the wealthy to support the majority. They are as those who wanted more eggs from the golden goose and opened it up thus killing the source. Liberalism is couched in good feelings and generosity with the assets of others.Government should regulate and provide for all aspects of human life from the cradle to the grave. Government should decide who lives and who dies and when. Government should prevent individuals from owning property and goods. Everything should be owned by the government. No one should be permitted to enjoy the fruit of his labors because he would have more than others. This would be an inequality.The natural consequence of such a government will be the reduction of everyone to the same standard of living and the elimination of any personal motivation to excel in business.Everyone will be an employee of the government. No one will be free.In effect, it is a return to feudalism, where the government is the king.Nice try, but that's a strawman argument.Modern Liberals (and, I speak in world-wide terms as to what a Liberal is, not the mutant distorted view of a Liberal that seems to have taken hold in the U.S.A.) generally believe in these fundamental concepts:Capitalism is the proper form of economic theoryHowever, Capitalism has significant failings when attempting to build a societyTo fix failings of the Capitalist economic theory in society, ideas from Socialism can be applied.This fusion of Capitalist economic ideas with Socialist social society ideas is the primary definition of a modern Liberal.Practically speaking, this means that a Liberal espouses many (though likely not all) of the following ideals:As it is impossible for each citizen to start out life on a truly even level, societal justice (harmony, happiness, etc.) demand that society manage some level of wealth redistribution, where the more fortunate subsidize those less able to provide for themselves.It is the responsibility of society (in the guise of government) to provide a minimum standard of living to all citizens. This may or may not include items such a public heathcare, housing provisions, retirement funds, etc.Those who have more than others should be expected to proportionally contribute more to society as a whole. This does NOT mean that everyone should have the same level of income or wealth. It is most evident in having a Progressive tax system (where the percentage of taxation increases with income)Government should help protect citizens from events beyond their (reasonable) control - that is, provide a social "safety net" to cushion the blows that chance may deal out. Examples of this would be Disaster Relief programs, Job Retraining, Unemployment Insurance.Individuals should be rewarded for industriousness and therefore be able to benefit from the fruits of their labors, though government may chose to restrict certain economic activities as harmful to the society as a whole (even though certain individuals might benefit greatly).Government is responsible for managing the country's resources in a manner most beneficial to society as a whole and for the long-term, and should have the power to regulate private use of common shared resources.Justice (in the legal systems) should not be dependent on wealth or stationJustice should be about the Spirit of the law, and take into account all circumstances surrounding the crime, both positive and negative, and should be applied as evenly as possible.As Justice is imperfect, and as capital punishment is an irreversible act, the state should not be permitted to commit an irreversible act on imperfect evidence. Therefore, capital punishment is immoral and impermissible.As future generations are important, and the family unit provides considerable social stability and other benefits, families should be supported and encouraged. This may include items such as paid family leave, subsidies for having children (including tax breaks), free daycare, etc.Any specific Religion should have no role in defining societal morals. In particular, moral behavior is an individual's right to determine for themselves, so long as it does not impinge on another's right to determine their own morals. Legality and morality (or, ethics vs morals) are distinct. Most specifically, government should NEVER be in the business of defining morality.Religion should not have any influence in government, other than informing an individual's choice of morality.Certain industries or services are inherently a "natural monopoly", and as such, should either be heavily regulated or government-owned so as to provide the best societal benefit (not the maximum profit). For example: power distribution, roadways, water supplies, etc.There are plenty of other examples, but the main thrust behind Liberalism is twofold: societal justice and harmony through some level of weath redistribution to soften the problems that random chance has on the society, and individual choice in determining their own personal behavior so long as that behavior does not significantly impact social justice and harmony.

How can you be a liberal?

ANSWER:By definition, you can be a "liberal", by being open minded and not so strictly bound to the observance of orthodox, traditional or established forms or ways. Of course, if one were to use that definition as the sole parameters of being liberal, then that definition necessarily becomes orthodoxy and an established form of liberalism. How can you be a liberal if being a liberal means acting solely as liberal has been defined? Being a liberal is quite different than being liberal. We can be liberal with the peanut butter when we spread it upon our bread and conservative in our politics. We can be liberal with our generosity yet conservative with our trust. But in the end, being liberal is not the same as being a liberal.In the realm of politics there are two primary views by which we regard the law and the governments created to enforce that law. There are those who take a conservative view of the law, giving as much weight and credence to the historical context of the law as to its relevance today and who rely upon the original text of any given legislation or constitution as a means to interpret the laws intent. A liberal, on the other hand, will keep an open mind about the text, only acknowledging the text and any historical context are only part of the truth, and that often times the true intent of law can not be found solely within the text. In simple terms a liberal will discuss the spirit of the law and a conservative will discuss the letter of the law.There is no right or wrong or good or bad in being either liberal or conservative. The viewpoint is yours, and as long as the goals are the same, then the variance in view point only helps us attain that goal rather than keep us from getting there. Liberals and conservatives are not diametrically opposed to each other, they are inextricably bound to each other in their purpose. As the liberal demands progress and demands it now, the conservative does not seek to impede any progress but only insure that progress is being made by insisting that prudence and patience in the effort while adhering to the letter of the law as the best and surest way towards that goal. So, while the conservative demands we keep a tight reign on the beast of burden we call government, the liberal will continue to dig their spurs into the beast, prodding it onward, demanding the ass perform as if it were a stallion. And indeed there have been times, when liberals have managed to convince mules to be stallions, and government can do remarkable things. Even so, the conservative will want to slow that progress down to a measured response.Does progress only happen because of liberals? Consider the myth of Icarus, where he, imprisoned on an island with his father, learned to fly. Learning to fly is indeed progress for humans. It was Icarus' father Daedalus, who designed and built the wings that would facilitate their escape from the island. Daedalus took the feathers from birds and fastened them together with rope and wire and hoped to keep them together with wax. His design worked and Daedalus was able to fly. He built a pair of wings for his son Icarus and taught him how to fly and then warned him not to fly too high in to the sky so as to avoid the heat of the sun that would surely melt the wax that kept the wings together. Icarus being young had a more open mind about such things and once airborne he couldn't help but soar as eagles do, higher and even higher in his majestic escape. Daedalus pleaded with his son to fly low, but Icarus kept progressing upward until the heat of the sun was finally hot enough to melt the wax of his wings and then the wings began to fall apart and disassemble and young, willful Icarus plummeted down towards his death, his progress cut short by his own hubris. Daedalus lived a long life mourning the loss of his son because he maintained a conservative view of what could be done and what should be done. Even though it is Daedalus who survives the journey, it is Icarus who is remembered. Daedalus survived but his survival enabled the myth of Icarus to flourish as the tale of a young boy who dared to soar where no man had ever soared before and for a brief and shining moment flew gloriously into immortality before discovering his own very real mortality.The myth of Icarus is a cautionary tale that warns that hubris comes before the fall. To be open minded and not bound by any dogma does not necessarily lead towards hubris and to be sure the dogmatic can just as easily be felled by their own hubris but to be open minded means to be willing to accept all information as true or at the very least as possibly true. To be open minded means to accept information that very well could be false data, as viable and equal to true data. The boundaries of right and wrong and good and bad become far more expansive to a liberal than to a conservative and herein lies the comfort of being conservative and the angst of being liberal because a conservative shouting out that that liberal on the other side is wrong is to be expected, but when a self professed liberal shouts out that the conservative is wrong, that open mind is so open any more and the boundaries of right and wrong just got closer and more constrictive. If a liberal, for example, embraces multiculturalism as a valid view point, but then rejects any culture that embraces racism or genocide as valid measures, isn't exactly embracing multiculturalism. It is this fundamental contradiction that troubles many liberals while conservatives can remain comfortable in their orthodoxy.There seems to be much confusion on what a liberal and a conservative is. It, of course, doesn't help when new terms are invented such as "neo-conservative" or "Social liberal but fiscal conservative." These terms only reveal the problem with language. Words should not be used to further confuse an issue, unless, of course, your intent is to lie. It should not be assumed that it is the intent of either a liberal or a conservative to deceive If either a liberal or a conservative are lying they are not being liberal or conservative but are instead acting upon their own agendas. The liberal and conservative are in the same camp it is the left wing and the right wing of political parties that act upon agendas. Liberals are often associated with the left wing and conservatives associated with the right wing but this is quite simply fallaciousness as the left wing is just as dogmatic in their socialist and communist orthodoxy as the right is in its corporatist and oligopolistic dogmas. Both the right and the left engage in class warfare in order to achieve their goals. Liberals and conservatives should have no business with this, as both the left and right are parties filled with brutes and bullies who seek to pervert the law towards their own end rather than interpret the law in an effort towards achieving the greater good. When we are acting in ways that lead us all towards the the greatest good to the greatest amount we are no longer left or right even though we have either a liberal or conservative viewpoint in what action best accomplishes that greater good.How can you be a liberal? You can be open minded and embrace many forms of knowledge on your journey towards progress and if your really smart you'll maintain your alliances with conservatives who might help you prevent any stumbles or falls or tragic plunges that come from majestic actions.

What word best fits Beveridge's views in his speech A Racism harsh treatment of Asians B Abolitionism freedom for Filipinos C Generosity send the Filipinos money D Christianity send more missionaries?

Add your answer:

How are the differences between universalizing and ethnic religions similar to the differences between folk and popular culture?

What were the reactions to the sugar act?

How did the supreme court in the 1870s and 1880s undermined republican reconstruction?

What do liberals believe government should be?

How can you be a liberal?

What has the author Jana Mullins written?

Is generosity an abstract nouns?

Is generosity a verb?

Is generosity is an abstract noun?

What animal symbolizes generosity?

Is the word generosity a abstract?

Use generosity in a sentence?

What did the code of chivery say about generosity?

Which word is considered an abstract - generosity or appreciated?

What is 'generosity' when translated from English to Italian?

What is the meaning of generosity?

What does ohanwaste mean in the Dakota language?

Resources

Top Categories

Product

Company