The Bayeux Tapestry has nothing to do with the Romans. (Nor is it a tapestry)
It was made to commemorate The Battle of Hastings in 1066
There are about 55 dogs in the embroidery
The Bayeux Tapestry is important since most paintings during the Medieval Ages consisted of Christian Art. The Bayeux Tapestry was one of the few found to have contained the daily life of peasants, kings and so on. This showed many researchers what life was like in the Medieval Ages. So basically it "opened" our eyes to the Medieval world
It is presently exhibited in a special museum in Bayeux, Normandy, France - where I went to see it for myself. Since the earliest known written reference to the tapestry is a 1476 inventory of Bayeux Cathedral, its origins have been the subject of much speculation and controversy. French legend maintained the tapestry was commissioned and created by Queen Matilda, William the Conqueror's wife, and her ladies-in-waiting. Indeed, in France it is occasionally known as "La Tapisserie de la Reine Mathilde" (Tapestry of Queen Matilda). However, scholarly analysis in the 20th century shows it probably was commissioned by William's half brother, Biship Odo. The reasons for the Odo commission theory include: 1) three of the bishop's followers mentioned in Doomsday Book appear on the tapestry; 2) it was found in Bayeux Cathedral, built by Odo; and 3) it may have been commissioned at the same time as the cathedral's construction in the 1070s, possibly completed by 1077 in time for display on the cathedral's dedication. Assuming Odo commissioned the tapestry, it was probably designed and constructed in England by Anglo-Saxon aritists given that Odo's main power base was in Kent, the Latin text contains hints of Anglo Saxon, other embroideries originate from England at this time, and the vegetable dyes can be found in cloth traditionally woven there. Assuming this was the case, the actual physical work of stitching was most likely undertaken by skilled seamsters. Anglo-Saxon needlework, was famous across Europe.
Yes, they are considered to be primary sources. Perhaps one of the best examples of this is the Bayeux tapestry which depicts the Norman conquest of England. Tapestries are not to be underestimated as source material as despite their pictorial format they provide information about the sort of views that were contemporary with the historical event you're looking into. For example, within the Bayeux tapestry you will find King Harold as being referred to as "Rex" which is the Latin for King. However, by the end of the 11th century Norman sources do not actually refer to him as a King. In this sense you can see how chroniclers are presentinghistory to fit the views of the Norman house.
The famous Tapestry which shows the Battle action of the Norman Conquest- and also Halley"s Comet, was credited to Queen Matilda- who was the spouse of King William the Conqueror. In a sense tapestries were the wide-screen movies of their day- and later cycloramas took the step farther- Cycloramas were out in Elizabethan times. an excellent question- the huge and visible (apparently in Daylight) Stella is obviously Halley"s Comet. Your star is rising.
In the 1070'!
Bayeux, France.
there was 3 women who made the Bayeux Tapestry
The Bayeux Tapestry is actually an embroidery, and it was not made in Bayeux but in England.
it was made of linen
people
the Bayeux tapestry was made to celebrate the success of king William the *******
The Bayeux Tapestry was designed and made to celebrate and record the battle of Hastings in October 1066.
metal
nuns
France
The Bayeux Tapestry