0
When you cannot find any other sources that supports its arguments.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What The believability and authority of a speaker is called?
credibility -Apex ;)
Why must students of history learn to evaluate historical sources?
Historical sources for records should always be evaluated because not all historical sources are equal in terms of accuracy or purpose. Sources fall into three basic categories: (1) sources that are indisputable; (2) sources that contain unintentional errors; and (3) sources that are deliberate falsehoods and have an ulterior purpose. Humans aren't perfect and it was common to make accidental mistakes when writing things down. If a historian uses sources, his unintentional errors can be remedied. Often, a writer could have had an ulterior motive in writing a record in a certain way. This happened frequently. What it means, is that a person may have had a hidden agenda while recording their version and deliberately left out information or actually made up information that seems to support what they have written. If they don't have sources, their writing should not be considered reliable. If their writing goes against the mainstream thought, their sources should be carefully analyzed to see if they should be given any weight. Thirdly, there are different kinds of sources. Some sources can be relied upon absolutely, like wills, and court records because they are, by their nature, factual and unbiased; while others, such as a written version of an oral history, aren't such good proof. To be able to write or talk about a historical event accurately, a student of history should always dig below the surface to verify information by looking at the number of sources, the quality of sources, and the type of source. A student of history cannot be taken seriously by others if he doesn't have good sources to support his position.
In order to make a valid historical interpretation about an event historians must?
check primary and secondary sources related to the event - apex
What role do presidents play when they help someone campaign for a Senate seat?
It helps...... BY MAKING SPEECHES HELP IMPROVE THE CAMPAIGN' A presidential backing helps the potential senator gain credibility. The idea is, if the President likes him/her you should too.
What is the gap term used to indicate the distress of the government and older officials during Vietnam?
Credibility gap
When should you question a credibility?
When you cannot find any other sources that supports its arguments.
What should sources be evaluated for?
Sources should be evaluated for credibility, reliability, accuracy, and relevance to ensure the information is trustworthy and appropriate for the intended purpose. Check the author's credentials, publication date, potential biases, and supporting evidence to determine the credibility of a source.
Why should you question a sources credibility?
Questioning a source's credibility is important to ensure that the information being provided is accurate, unbiased, and reliable. By evaluating the credibility of a source, you can better assess the quality and trustworthiness of the information it presents. This helps in making informed decisions and drawing valid conclusions.
Once you've found your sources for your research essay how should you decide on an answer to your research question?
After gathering sources for your research essay, critically evaluate the information for relevance, credibility, and authority. Analyze the data based on its alignment with your research question and the strength of the evidence provided. By synthesizing the information from different sources, you can develop a well-rounded answer to your research question.
Which source should be most carefully examined for credibility?
Primary sources, such as original research studies, official government documents, and eyewitness accounts, should be carefully examined for credibility as they provide firsthand information on a particular topic without interpretation or bias from other sources. It's important to evaluate the source of the primary information and consider how it was collected, analyzed, and if it aligns with other reputable sources.
What factors influence the perceived credibility of informal communication sources?
[object Object]
Why should Mainstream news sources be evaluated?
Mainstream news sources should be evaluated because they may have biases or be influenced by political or financial interests that can affect the accuracy and objectivity of their reporting. It's important for individuals to critically assess the credibility and reliability of news sources to make informed and well-rounded decisions.
When do you use sources of information?
Sources of information should be used whenever you need to support a claim, provide evidence for an argument, or verify a fact. They are essential for ensuring accuracy, credibility, and reliability in writing, research, and decision-making processes.
Which detail can you examine to determine a sources credibility?
The authority of the author to write about the subject ywwwww :)
Why should you use sources writing a composition?
Using sources in a composition helps to provide evidence to support your arguments, strengthen the credibility of your work, and show that you have researched your topic thoroughly. Additionally, citing sources allows readers to verify the information you present and can help you avoid plagiarism.
What are some questions based on the credibility gap?
How can organizations bridge the credibility gap between themselves and their stakeholders? What strategies can leaders adopt to address the credibility gap in communication with their teams? In what ways can media outlets work to regain trust with the public and reduce the credibility gap? How do individuals assess the credibility of information sources to minimize the credibility gap in their decision-making processes?
What can you examine to determine a sources credibility?
The authority of the author to write about the subject -Apex
