0
In New York poor people mostly lived in run down appartments that were way too crowded. A lot of times over 2,500 people lived in 1 block of these jam packed appartments. On the other hand, the rich mostly lived in big fancy mansions that could take a whole block.
A lot of people that lived in New York were origanaly from a different country.
The poor had to work a lot in order to pay rent, food, clothing and all other needs. The rich didn't have to work that much and mostly worked in fancy offices of millionaire buissnesses.
A lot of poor kids had to work instead of attending school. Children of rich parents had private tutors.
Factory conditions were horrible and people had long hours (I mean REALLY long - 14 hours long) and SUPER low pay checks (SUPER DUPER low pay - $0.20 a day [14 hours work]) vs. the rich who mostly had things like 6 hour days and ENORMUS pay checks
ADDITION: The person above has been misinformed. Workers were, on average around this time, payed $0.22 an hour, not a day. Although that seems like VERY VERY little, it was in fact, more then federal minimum wage today. When adjusted for inflation, $0.22 cents an hour comes out to about $5.62 an hour in 2008 dollars. For comparison, a loaf of bread costs (on average in the US) around $2.00 (guesstimate)in 2008. Where as in 1900 it would have cost $0.05. When adjusted for inflation, that comes out to about $1.28 in 2008 dollars. So although most of them were making only $5.62 (in 2008 dollars) an hour, some things were cheaper. That's not to say that most people weren't living in poverty. But to claim that 1900's America was a horrible deathly place where everyone was a begger is to go a little bit to far. Although most people were poor, a fair amount of them were doing much better then they had been in other countries. As a comparision, most of them were probably living like alot of the illegal immigrants are in the United States today. It sucks, but they live here because of what they had in their native countries was much much worse.
Don't let teachers misinform you, 1900s America wasn't THAT bad. As someone who has worked 14 hour days over and over while underage I can attest that there are far worse things. Most people were happy to be in this country in 1900. In a lot of ways, they had it better then us in 2009.
What else can I help you with?
Which of these groups would be MOST likely to support the sentiments expressed in this nineteenth-century advertising label of Boss Tweed?
the urban poor
What were the differences between the rich and the poor in the 19th century?
There were differences in the way the rich and the poor made money. The rich invested in monopolies while the poor just made a little bit of money in factories.
Name two famous social workers from 19-20 century?
in the 19 century how was the poor law instrumental in the development of social work
Was a black soldier who fought bravely during the battle of bunker hill (1775)?
salem poor (:
When was Poor Fellow My Country created?
Poor Fellow My Country was created in 1975.
Where did the poor live in 19th century cities?
The poor lived in tenements, which are like modern day slums.
In the late nineteenth century America cities A. the wealth lived at the core B. the poor were thrust to the outer fringes C.Residential patterns reflected the mingling of economic classes.?
B
Which was not a problem faced by workers in nineteenth century mills or mines?
poor wind power
How were cities physically reshaped in response to the early nineteenth century?
During the early nineteenth century there was a vast migration from the country into cities. This migration led to major problems in cities such as waste-management. It also helped to create urban slums. In addition to the migration from the American countryside, there were also waves of immigrants pouring into the country throuh Ellis Island, making cities, especially New York and its surrounding areas a lot more ethnically diverse. Because most of these immigrants were also poor, their coming to cities was another contributing factor to urban slums.
In nineteenth century cities the poor lived?
In crowded and unsanitary conditions in tenement buildings, often facing overcrowding, poor sanitation, and lack of access to clean water and healthcare. Many poor families struggled to make ends meet and lived in poverty due to low wages and limited job opportunities.
Which of these groups would be MOST likely to support the sentiments expressed in this nineteenth-century advertising label of Boss Tweed?
the urban poor
What were the hospital conditions like in the middle of the nineteenth century?
They were overcrowded, with several people sharing a bed, with very poor sanitation and very dirty.
Why was there so much poor housing in the towns and cities in the 19th century?
because they couldnt afford it
What occurred as a direct result of the U.S.'s late-nineteenth century industrialization?
The late-nineteenth century industrialization in the U.S. led to rapid urbanization, with people moving from rural areas to cities in search of work. It also brought about an increase in wealth inequality, as industrialists amassed significant fortunes while workers faced poor working conditions and low wages. Additionally, labor unions began to form in response to these injustices, leading to organized labor movements and strikes.
How did rich and poor people live in 19th century New York City?
The same way they do now. The poor cursed the rich and the rich cursed the poor.
Where did the poor live in 19th century?
The poor lived in tenements, which are like modern day slums.
Bubonic plaque of the mid-fourteenth century was the most devasting natural disaster in European history?
poor sanitation in crowded European cities
