the urban poor
Chat with our AI personalities
In the interest of free speech, we would not want to ban TV advertisement. However, there should also be regulations against false or misleading advertisement. Freedom of speech is a good thing, but it does have its limits. * i woulnt say it is in the interest of free speech, tv ads are bought they are revenue. Now we have a debate (also an example of free speech). The companies which advertise, and the broadcasters who sell advertising time, are interested in their profits primarily - although even then, advertisement does include political advertisement, which is about larger issues than profits. However, the government, and the voters who elect the politicians who govern, have other interests, and they allow advertisement because they value freedom of speech, not because they feel that it is necessary to support the profits of the TV industry. TV can exist without advertising. People already pay for cable service, so it is possible to control access and to charge for it, using that money to fund the production of TV. That is what happens in some countries. Not all television is supported by advertising, and even in the US there are some stations which do not carry commercial advertising. When the general public allows advertising they do so because they value free speech.
If a person needs support from the government , the letter should contain what type of support is needed. The letter should also contain how much support is needed.
did not support a war with France.
He had To stop his effort to win support for the league of nations
Because the government also has lack of capital to support the businessman or the entrpreneurs.