Historians study the past through speeches, old texts and other resources they can find and then create theories about the time being studied. Archaeologists, like historians, would do the same except they would uncover more physical objects, like buildings, bodies etc. Historians and archaeologists can study primary or secondary recources (primary resources being the most accurate, but remember everything is bias, unless it is coming from a third party): Primary resource: A source from the time or very close to the time, for example: •A briefcase from the Titanic •An unexploded shell (bomb) from WWII in Germany (thousands are being uncovered every year actually) •A Roman sword or arrow tip found in a battle site •King Tutankhaman's tomb •A diary of a Roman philosopher Secondary resource: A source from after the time being studied, for example: •A speech about the Vietnam War made after the war •Biographies •Dictionaries (I don't know how I got this one) •A WWI memorial made in 2015 •Speches about historical events (even if it is about your life, because it isn't made at the time) I hope I helped :)
A person who flees from justice
bureaucracy
the democrats had majorities...
The democratic ideals of the American people.
a cuban freedom fighter
The term usually used by historians is The Dual Monarchy.
pinpoint the time or place groups of people lived:) FLVS
primary source documents that are useful in the study of history
The term usually used by historians is The Dual Monarchy.
A store employee.
Selecting the most qualified people for the job
its there job hello
I have worked with a cash register at my last job
It describes the event as it was experienced at the time. (APEX)
>taking on extra tasks or volunteering to work extra hours<
Personal freedom
having to stay at one job just to pay what you owe