0
Which stamens describes why historians might want to use a source to study an event?
It describes the event as it was experienced at the time. (APEX)
What else can I help you with?
How can personal biases and points of view influence historians when they are studying evidence?
Answer this question… They can lead historians to arrive at very different interpretations of an event.
What kind of source would a historian use to get a firsthand account of a past event?
You would consult a primary source for a first and personal view of an historical event. Primary sources are original materials.
Why would a historian use a primary source when studying about historical event?
Answer this question… Primary sources are created by people who actually experienced the event
Secondary sources of history?
a source that is from someone that was not a the place
What are the limitations of the sources of history?
What is known about ancient history is based on sources and it can be expected that these sources are limited if only because of the time an ancient historical event happened and the present day. Nevertheless, here are the source limitations faced by historians in their studies:A. Ancient historical writings about history may have been written hundreds of years after the historian begins a record. In dealing with the writings of the ancients it must be remembered that they did not have the resources that modern day historians have, such as carbon dating and a vast network of "finds" based on modern archeology. Therefore the accuracy of ancient historians can be called into question;B. While modern historians can rely on archaeologists with scientific data to assist them, they are limited, because of time, to explain "cultural" facts that may have influenced the ancient writers;C. Modern historians must base much of their writings upon the records of ancient historians, which may be inaccurate. By the same token, the same problem confronted the ancient historians as they too must rely on earlier writers;D. Historians, both modern and ancient, understand that the sources of previous writers may be prejudicial. This may be the result, for example of a writer in the time of Julius Caesar. If the historian favors the deeds of a Caesar, the historical records may not be totally accurate;E. Since we have Caesar here, his own writings on his conquests in Gaul must always be seen as a man writing about his own history. Thus the source can be questioned;F. Conflicting historical writings can always exist. The historian reviewing these faces another source limitation;G. Lack of historical records. The ancient Egyptians have left no blueprints on building pyramids. Scholars, archeologists, and engineers and others still speculate how they were built; andH. Myths. Historians are frequently faced with ancient historians who may have based their writings on "myths". For all practical purposes, as one example, the founding of ancient Rome is dated at 753 BC, this is an educated guess. It may also be termed a myth, thus the historian is faced with another limited source.
Is a second hand source reliable?
Historians will examine a second hand source of a historical event. If the second hand source matches up to other sources of information, then each source in a certain manner adds to the credibility of the historical event.
What is one term for one kind or source most used by historians to answer questions about the past?
Primary sources are used commonly among historians. A primary source of information is an account from someone that was present at a certain time or event.
What accurately describes a newspaper article written during a historical event?
Primary source.
What are two rules historians use to determine the quality of a primary source?
Historians use the time and place rule to determine how close to the event was the person describing the event and how much time was between the event and when the event was described. In addition, they use the bias rule. Documents must be compared with relatedsources and pieces of evidence.
The firsthand record of a person place or event that has not been interpreted by another writer best describes a?
D.primary source
What document accurately describes a newspaper article written during a historical event?
Primary source.
The firsthand record of a person place or event that has not been interpreted by another writer best describes a n?
The firsthand record of a person, place, or event that has not been interpreted by another writer best describes a(n) _____. ANSWER: Primary Source:)
The time and place rule determines that the a source and its creator were to an event in the past the more valuable the source will be?
Historians use the time and place rule because the source is deemed to be more reliable. The other rule historians use is the bias rule that says everyone will be biased in some way when recounting events.
How can a person be cosidered a primary source?
A person can be considered a primary source if they directly experienced or witnessed an event they are describing, providing firsthand accounts or original data without interpretation or analysis. Primary sources are valuable for historians and researchers seeking unfiltered information from the time of the event.
Which term describes a clearly stated argument supporting a particular point of view?
Two arguments about a historical event contradict each other. How should historians determine which argument is superior?
What do historians mean when they refer to the historians context of an event?
When a historian refers to the historical context of an event they mean that they want you to look at the attitude, conditions and mood of the time of a specific historical event.
How can personal biases and points of view influence historians when they are studying evidence?
Answer this question… They can lead historians to arrive at very different interpretations of an event.
