In the United States, traditionally, the Republican Party has been the party of business, and thus attracted the majority of wealthy business owners and others interested in maintaining the status quo.
However, over the past 30 years since the Republican Party discovered the power of the Religious Conservative movement, their membership has swelled with heavily socially conservative voters, who tend to be considerably poorer than the typical "average" Republican of before. At the same time, many Republican Party policies have soured (particularly) small businesses owners, who have left. If I had to break it down on class levels, the Reps now are mostly Upper Upper Class (superrich), Upper Class (rich), Lower Middle Class, and Upper Lower Class folks.
On the other side, the Democratic party has long been heavily represented by blue-collar union workers, and the urban poor (typically, minorities). Over the past 30 years as the Republican Party has turned to social conservatism and pro-Big Business policies, the Democratic party has attracted two new constituencies: the middle/upper middle class highly educated, and the socially liberal wealthy. A substantial portion of the truly wealthy class in the US cannot support the social conservatism of the Republican Party, and thus have moved to the Democrats (even though it might not be in their own self-interest, economically). Similarly, a very large portion of those with a high level of education have become Democratic due to social policy, and these folks make up the Professional class (doctors, lawyers, engineers, etc.). In a similar generalization, I'd say the Democrats are now the majority in the Middle/Lower Lower Class.
The Upper Middle Class (well-off) still likely leans Republican, as that area includes a large number of retirees and older folks who are traditionally more socially conservative.
So, overall, I'd estimate that the breakdown of the two parties is (by wealth class):
Top 1%: 90% Rep, 10% Dem
Top 5%: 60% Rep, 40% Dem
Top 25%: 30% Rep, 70% Dem
Middle 50%: 50% Rep, 50% Dem
Bottom 25%: 70% Rep, 30% Dem
The bottom 25% is much more heavily Republican only because I'm counting those who ACTUALLY VOTE. Registration-wise, there is likely to be a Democratic edge in the bottom 50% of all voters (i.e more people registered Dem than Rep), but those registered Rep are more likely to actually vote in an election, so it turns out that it appears that there are more Rep than Dem votes in the lower 50%.
[Further note: the above goes to party registration only. About one-third of total voters consider themselves "Independent", though they may be registered with one party or the other. The voters tend to be the "swing" votes, as they will frequently support different parties in each election, whereas "solid" Republican/Democract supporters vote for their party in most elections. Those labeling themselves Independent tend to be mostly from the second quartile (i.e. 50-75% wealth bracket). That is, Independents tend to be Middle Class (of all stripes), not Upper or Lower class.]
Washington wrote that the party would be more concerned with it’s self than the voters common good.
political map is used to show borders and boundaries which help us to know the size of a country,extension,etc.
Political parties in the U.S. are highly decentralized and "weak" (according to most political scientists). This is likely because of the primary system combined with a first-past-the-post electoral system, in which voters from individual districts choose the nominee for each party. This allows voters to choose who most reflect their values (like pro-gun, anti-abortion Democrats in the South). In the UK, where the parties are much stronger and more centralized, the leadership of the parties choose the nominees for each district -- the voters get no say. This lends itself to party members falling in line with the wants of the party leaders much more. John McCain and Arlen Specter are basically impossible in the UK.
The democrat party is the major party that is associated with being more on the liberal side of the political spectrum.
Democrats
Which political party republican or democrat benefit when income in texas increases or decrease in other words which party has more wealthy voters and which has more poor voters.
there are more independent voters and people are now more educated to the corrupt nature of parties
In the United States, there are more registered Democrats than Republicans. The ratio is 3-2 in favor of the Democrat Party. However, with that being said both parties target the largest group of voters who are "independent" citizens without any registration to any party.
In the United States, there are more registered Democrats than Republicans. The ratio is 3-2 in favor of the Democrat Party. However, with that being said both parties target the largest group of voters who are "independent" citizens without any registration to any party.
Washington wrote that the party would be more concerned with it’s self than the voters common good.
Washington wrote that the party would be more concerned with it’s self than the voters common good.
political map is used to show borders and boundaries which help us to know the size of a country,extension,etc.
Texas has an open primary system in which all registered voters are allowed to participate. However, a voter may only vote in one Party's primary. You may not vote, or participate, in more than one political party's primary election.
Having more than one political party can be desirable as it promotes diversity of opinions, encourages healthy debate, and provides voters with a wider range of choices. It can also help prevent the concentration of power in the hands of a single party, promoting checks and balances within the political system.
Political parties in the U.S. are highly decentralized and "weak" (according to most political scientists). This is likely because of the primary system combined with a first-past-the-post electoral system, in which voters from individual districts choose the nominee for each party. This allows voters to choose who most reflect their values (like pro-gun, anti-abortion Democrats in the South). In the UK, where the parties are much stronger and more centralized, the leadership of the parties choose the nominees for each district -- the voters get no say. This lends itself to party members falling in line with the wants of the party leaders much more. John McCain and Arlen Specter are basically impossible in the UK.
In a two party system, there exists minor parties. A minor party is a smaller, less influential political party. The two party system is when two parties control almost all the political roles. The two major parties also have a majority of the registered voters willing to vote in their party's favor. Minor parties tend to be more single focus platforms while the two major parties encompass many issues.
The democrat party is the major party that is associated with being more on the liberal side of the political spectrum.