answersLogoWhite

0

This is to stop congress form passing a law against something that has already happened. In order to be convicted of violating a law, the law must be in effect at the time of the act. You can not be convicted of violating a law if the law is passed after the fact.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

TaigaTaiga
Every great hero faces trials, and you—yes, YOU—are no exception!
Chat with Taiga
LaoLao
The path is yours to walk; I am only here to hold up a mirror.
Chat with Lao
BlakeBlake
As your older brother, I've been where you are—maybe not exactly, but close enough.
Chat with Blake
More answers

These are both outlawed under the Constitution. The Framers thought it was unjust to be charged with a crime that was no illegal until after the deed was done (as per ex post facto). Bills of attainder were frowned down upon especially because in colonial America, many colonists were accused of crimes, refused a jury, and send to prison.t

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago
User Avatar

a bill of is a legislative that inflicts punishment without a court trial (a law passed after the fact ) has three features.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
User Avatar

The Constitution forbids Congress from passing ex post facto laws because the laws make an act a crime after the act has been committed.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why are the bills of attaibder and ex post facto laws forbidden?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp