Freedom to say what ever anyone wants to must be balanced by the freedom to be told to shut up because what is being said is wrong ! But that does not deny the person saying the 'wrong' thing the right to say it. Nonetheless there are laws which proscribe the rights of people to say things which, for example, inflame racial hatred. There must be a balance of freedom & responsibility & judgment of this is a difficult one to assess. This is in this instance the case that you can type whatever you like on WA: Anything... I cannot stop you publishing whatever you want to say, however base, but if you contravene TOU (Terms of use) then you will be banned ! Hmm, so much for freedom of speech, eh.... No, you must say what you will, but there are defined limits in this situation & in the world at large. In fact it is all about how it is phrased, if you can say something difficult well then you will probably get away with it, if you say 'All *&^%$%^s are (*&^&*&%s' then you will not.
Freedom of speech (apex)
One problem with the sedition act was that it limited the freedom of speech for people. It didn't allow people to say anything bad about the country or the government.
over time, the supreme court became less likely to allow restrictions on free speech
A good house captain speech should begin with a strong introduction that captures the audience's attention. The speech should include the candidate's qualifications, such as leadership experience, organizational skills, and commitment to serving the house and its members. It is important to outline specific ideas and plans for how the candidate intends to improve the house community and foster a sense of unity and teamwork. The speech should end with a powerful conclusion that reinforces the candidate's suitability for the role and inspires confidence in their ability to lead.
according to the speaker's guidebook 2009 MLA it says there should be between 2-5 main points.
i hate this!
Hate speech and speech likely to incite violence are not protected .
unquestionably!
Yes, the university should ban hate speech. They have an image to uphold and they don't want to alienate potential students.
A speech, involving hate
No, the government should not because it would take away the 1st admeadment
Yes, hate speech laws are apart of the First Amendment of the US Constitution. The amendment prohibits the regulation of speech even hate speech.
A noun, verb, or adjective:Hate is a dangerous vice. (noun, subject of the sentence)I hate him. (verb)He was arrested for his hate speech. (adjective, describes the noun 'speech')
To file a complaint about hate speech, you can contact the platform where the speech occurred (social media site, website, etc.) and report the specific content. Provide details and evidence to support your claim. You can also reach out to local law enforcement or organizations that specialize in monitoring and combatting hate speech.
"Freedom of expression" allows you to exercise constitutionally protected FREE SPEECH. It does not allow you to commit a criminal act in pursuit of it.
Well... first of all... some people don't hate speech, and people who hate speech doesn't really like school that much or your shy and don't wanna talk that much. Speech is just to help you pronounce your words a little better.
Hate speech criminalization is a major limitation on speech. Diversity people are granted special protection by big government so as to prevent their hurt feelings and prevent them from reacting with violence toward a hate speaker. If a Diversity person or a hate speaker react with any form of violence, only the hate speaker is necessarily subject to government prosecution for hate speech. The intent of hate speech criminalization is to chill criticism of Diversity people. Another limitation on speech is free speech zones designated by big government. Outside a free speech zone a speaker is subject to arrest and prosecution.