it was necessary because it helps the laws to passed down by the people
Chat with our AI personalities
The critical thing to remember about such terms as activism and restraint is that they are (
judicial activism!
A person who favors judicial activism is one who prefers a decision to be made via a personal opinion, rather than focusing on the law. A person who does this is considered unlawful or a federalist.
Judicial activism weakens the separation of powers by involving the Court in what are traditionally executive and legislative functions. Judicial restraint reinforces separation of powers.
The Warren Court, which was active from 1953 until Chief Justice Earl Warren retired in 1969, is often accused of judicial activism for its many decisions supporting African-Americans' civil rights.Judicial activism is often a derogatory charge associated with the phrase "legislating from the bench," that implies the Court exceeds its authority toUNDER CONSTRUCTION