The critical thing to remember about such terms as activism and restraint is that they are (
judicial activism!
A person who favors judicial activism is one who prefers a decision to be made via a personal opinion, rather than focusing on the law. A person who does this is considered unlawful or a federalist.
Judicial activism weakens the separation of powers by involving the Court in what are traditionally executive and legislative functions. Judicial restraint reinforces separation of powers.
The Warren Court, which was active from 1953 until Chief Justice Earl Warren retired in 1969, is often accused of judicial activism for its many decisions supporting African-Americans' civil rights.Judicial activism is often a derogatory charge associated with the phrase "legislating from the bench," that implies the Court exceeds its authority toUNDER CONSTRUCTION
Her films and recordings can still be enjoyed, and her civil rights activism is still an example to us.
Americans' attitudes toward unconventional activism vary widely depending on individual beliefs, values, and experiences. Some may view unconventional activism as a necessary and effective means of driving social change, while others may see it as disruptive or inappropriate. Factors such as cultural background, political ideology, and personal experiences all play a role in shaping attitudes toward unconventional activism in the United States.
period of activism?
Rhythm Activism was created in 1986.
Rhythm Activism ended in 1998.
mine workers/black sharecroppers
Not necessary, perhaps, but still advisable.
The critical thing to remember about such terms as activism and restraint is that they are (
the fish were actively swimming in the lake
Activism is the use of direct or confrontational action. It can include showing support or opposition in a demonstration, strike or cause. For example, there has been activism lately over the issue of gay marriage.
Engaging in political action regardless of its legality or ethics is known as radical activism. While some may argue that it is necessary to challenge unjust laws and norms through radical activism, others believe that adherence to legal and ethical principles is essential to maintain societal order and fairness. It is important for individuals and groups to carefully consider the potential consequences and impacts of their actions when choosing to engage in radical activism.
no its not necessary see a black widow its not poisinous