They were very touched, but... NOT IN A GOOD WAY... They strongly opposed their new Policies. Hated it enough to start a boycott, establish the Committee of Correspondence, the Boston Tea Part. And Eventually War with the British.
Daniel Morgan introduced an entirely new type of army in the Revolutinary War. He taught his men to hide in the Forrest and await the British soldiers to cross the road in front of them so they could shoot at them. this was an entirely new battle strategy that was never before used because all soldiers were used to standing in a line across the battle field firing at each other.
Basically, the soldiers would stay in the ditches, and shoot at any enemy troops that came in range of the ditch.
According to the book The Boston Campaign, written by Victor Brooks, it was 95 degrees that afternoon. On the third and final charge many of the British shed their red coats.
She told her suitors that whoever can string Odysseus's rigid bow and shoot an arrow through twelve axe shafts may have her hand. -Cj
they shoot 1 another
The Boston Massacre.
British soldiers were nicknamed "Tommies"- see the poem by Rudyard Kipling. For it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an' "Chuck him out, the brute!" But it's "Saviour of 'is country," when the guns begin to shoot;
"Shoot the troop of soldiers from the stoop."
America didn't fight Britain in World War 2. They were allies. However, the number of Accidental deaths of British troops caused by the Americans enforced, "Shoot everything" training is unknown.
Their feet
British soldiers were nicknamed "Tommies"- see the poem by Rudyard Kipling. For it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an' "Chuck him out, the brute!" But it's "Saviour of 'is country," when the guns begin to shoot;
The word Sniper comes from a play on words by British soldiers in India as early as 1773. Here troops hunted the Snipe, a small, quick bird that was difficult to shoot. Successful shooters were dubbed Snipers. However the true Sniper as we know him today was developed by the German Army of WW1.
Yes and no. The British didn't expect the colonists to shoot back and weren't prepared for the day. Their ultimate goal was to collect a storehouse of weapons in Concord. Dressed in wool uniforms on a humid hot day, with wet boots from wading onshore from boats before the march to Lexington they got blisters, they ran out of ammunition, and had a lack of water. Some went mad after seeing friends get shot and because of the conditions. The colonists followed them back to Boston shooting behind fences and trees with each shot. The British thought that it was against battle form to have the colonists shoot, move, shoot. Look for the Hallmark Hall of Fame movie based on the book April Morning. It gives a good sense of the day and what may have happened. Pay close attention to how the British march into Lexington that morning and imagine you are standing on the green as they come into the town.
The same as white soldiers, to shoot and be shot at.
Everyone deserves a defense in a court of law. What if they were not guilty? I don't believe they were. After all, the American Patriots were screaming at the squad of British Soldiers who were guarding the tea warehouse, and started throwing stones and other things at them. The British were very, very scared. There were more Patriots than British soldiers. The soldiers that had been in the military for a while understood clearly that their instructions were to NOT shoot any Patriots. Well, one of the British soldiers turned out to be a teenager who had never seen combat and, in fact, had been in the British army for only a short time. He panicked and fired at the Patriots, hitting one of them and killing him. That sounds a lot like self-defense, I think.
They still do.