I grew up in the 1960s. One does not have the choice of the date of birth. You get what you are given & I suppose you have to make the best of it. There were good times and times that were not so good: There was brilliant music, we all love the music of our youth, we all think that is the best there is I am sure. The world has changed & will go on changing, time will not stand still and we, none of us, will never recapture those halcyon days..........
Advantages of being your child's teacher would be the ability to take things at the child's pace. As the parent you would be able to work with the areas that your child is strong and take more time for what areas they need help in.
William Shakespeare was the famous poet of all time. Shakespeare married Anne Hathaway on November 1583 and after 6 months of being married; Anne gave birth to Susana, their first child.
If you name a child after its grandfather and the child and grandfather have the same surname and middle name (if any), then the child can be called "the second."However if someone in your generation (a brother or cousin) is also named after the grandfather and has the same middle and surname, that person is "the second" and your child would be "the third."
When the best and brightest people of a country leave it because they think they will have a better future elsewhere, that is only a disadvantage for the country that they leave and it will impair that county's development. It can only be an advantage if that country would have much more highly educated people that it can possibly employ. Because then it will solve an unemployment problem at home while at the same time solving another country's problem where to find good people to fill vacancies.
Yes. The name of his child was Francisco Rizal named after his father , his child was premature
the job of your parent isn't what makes it good to be their child, being the child of teacher is no better then being the kid of a doctor
I'm not sure if most people would do this, but just be supportive, and be there for your significant other even though it's not your child. Chances are, the real parent might not be the best person to look after the child, and you'd be better at being the parent anyways.
The child would also have O-.
1960s Underwater Disco
Her being bisexual has no effect on the sex of the child.
A child called it was written in 1995 and was set in the 1960s-1970s, not the 1920s.
Do you really trust the child-minder? If I were you, I'd do some deep extensive background checks into your child-minder. The child-minding business is easily abused by paedophiles and sex-traffickers. Hiring a nanny from a trusted company, preferably a government authority, is better than a child minder. Or even better still, have a member of your family look after the child. I really can't understand why a parent would leave their child for a month though. Sounds like a case of child neglect to me.
Most likely your child is average. Most of us are average. Being better than others does not guarantee you a good life. And, isn't that what you want for your child? Be satisfied that he/she is happy and contented. That's all you can expect.
Only child you get spoiled and from personal experience because of being an only child we had enough money to send me to the college of my dreams so defineltly an only child!
If you work at night, a judge would probably think it would be better for the child to live with his or her other parent.
This would be very unlikely. If the mother is providing for the child and the child is not being abused why would the child be taken away from the mother. Why would the child be taken away from where it is being cared for properly and give to someone who has had problems with the law?
Since you have a child together, you were certainly meant to come together at some time in your life. Maybe you are meant to be together forever, too, but maybe not. First, you need to think about your baby. Would the two of you together be good or not good for the future development of your child? Do you get along well? Would you be setting a good example for your child about how people who love each other and are together treat each other? Would your child be better cared for if you were together? Once you decide whether or not your child's life would be better, you can then think about your own life. Would your life improve if you were together? In what ways would it become better? In what ways would it be worse? Does he respect you? Does he treat you well? Is he caring and kind to you? You deserve a safe and happy life. Will he help you to achieve that? Or will he hurt your chances of being safe and happy? Will he bring drama into your life instead of security and love? Once you've figured out whether or not your life would be better, you can think about his life. Are you good for him? Do you bring out his best characteristics or his worst? Does he have a good chance of being happy with you? Or are his chances better if you are apart? THE MOST IMPORTANT thing to keep clear is this: your child will have a happy life if you and his daddy have a happy life. Your child will grow up to be a healthy person mentally if you and his daddy are healthy mentally. Give your child the best chance of success by being honest with yourself. Nobody is perfect, but are you and your baby daddy stable mentally, emotionally, and financially, and can you two give your child a good life together? Or is it better for the baby to grow up in a happy, healthy home with his two parents apart? It's a tough decision. Keep it clear and be honest, and you will make the best decision for your baby. Good luck.