Govern. by smalll group of people...oligarchy.
The opposite of rule by the people would be a dictatorship, tyranny, or other form of absolute rule (over the people). An absolute monarchy could also qualify. In communism, the state would operate "for" the people, and would actually need elements of democracy to determine what was best for everyone. In practice, it usually consists of an open oligarchy by its executives (commissariat).
Oligarchy is a form of power structure in which power effectively rests with a small number of people. These people might be distinguished by nobility, wealth, family ties, education or corporate, religious or military control.
No. There was the attempt, and hope that it would give freedom to all people. However, even after laws and papers were written, there was still enslavement and captivity of people.
Inter is a prefix for either inside or involved, to say you are inter means you are involved within something. While Generational Tyranny means a form of tyranny that passes on the sins of your father. To elaborate: Generational Tyranny would be that your father owed money and so by defacto of you being his son you are born into his debts. This doesn't deal strictly with debts alone but also contracts. Generational Tyranny would say that you are obligated to follow the laws of your forefather. Note that the above paragraph asserts that you under Generational Tyranny would not have any say in the matter of your contracts or debts inherited. Generational Tyranny claims that the the rulings of a few control the decisions of many even the ones who refuse and that no action is determined by the individual but rather a part of the Tyranny as all parties even the tyrant are conditioned to continue to support Generational Tyranny. Inter Generational Tyranny would be speaking of the interconnection between the various parties or specifically the platform of the interconnection. It could be a made up prefix to that word.
in an oligarchy because in a oligarchy, people have to listen
A Oligarchy because you rather have more people and not just one person
There is no definitive answer to what freedoms are enhanced by either an oligarchy or a tyranny. The amount of the peoples freedoms depends on the laws of each type of government. As an aside, a tyranny can be an oligarchy and vice versa.
Freedom and liberation.
A Greek city-state which was unbearably oppressed by its ruling oligarchy would appoint a tyrant to rule instead, the idea being that the tyrant would rule fairly for all classes.
Constraint, or slavery, or tyranny. Liberty is the freedom to act as you wish. The reverse would be subjugation of your thoughts and actions.
Govern. by smalll group of people...oligarchy.
freedom: liberation.
The opposite of rule by the people would be a dictatorship, tyranny, or other form of absolute rule (over the people). An absolute monarchy could also qualify. In communism, the state would operate "for" the people, and would actually need elements of democracy to determine what was best for everyone. In practice, it usually consists of an open oligarchy by its executives (commissariat).
Absolutely nothing, millions of people do. Freedom of expression and freedom of speech are basic human rights. Unless you live in a country ruled by tyranny then you'll probably be jailed.
Cuba is ruled by more than one person but not by many which is an oligarchy, not by one person which would be a monarchy or by the people of the nation which would be a democracy.
Ancient Greece was not a country - it was comprised of over 2,000 independent city-states. These city-states each changed their form of government periodically as problems arose, ranging from monarchy, oligarchy, tyranny, limited democracy and radical democracy. As one form failed, another would be tried. For example, Athens went from monarchy to oligarchy, tyranny, limited democracy and radical democracy, then back to limited democracy. Sparta went from a dual monarchy to a combined monarchy-oligarchy to a combined monarchy-limited democracy.