A collection of kingdoms under one powerful ruler is known as an empire. Examples of empires can be seen throughout history, the Roman Empire, the Ottoman empire, the Mongol Empire, and the British Empire, just to name a few.
An empire.
Osiris was the ruler of the underworld in ancient Egypt.
its empire
The Pharaoh at the time. The Words "ruler of Heliopolis" are sometimes writen under the name of the Pharaoh within the Cartouche, See Tutankhamen's cartouche.
empire is the awnser
Cleopatra did not kill her brother to have the throne; she already had the throne, but she had to share it with him as co-rulers. By killing him, she in effect had sole power because she named her baby son, Caesarion, as her co-ruler. (under Egyptian law a queen had to have a male co-ruler).Cleopatra did not kill her brother to have the throne; she already had the throne, but she had to share it with him as co-rulers. By killing him, she in effect had sole power because she named her baby son, Caesarion, as her co-ruler. (under Egyptian law a queen had to have a male co-ruler).Cleopatra did not kill her brother to have the throne; she already had the throne, but she had to share it with him as co-rulers. By killing him, she in effect had sole power because she named her baby son, Caesarion, as her co-ruler. (under Egyptian law a queen had to have a male co-ruler).Cleopatra did not kill her brother to have the throne; she already had the throne, but she had to share it with him as co-rulers. By killing him, she in effect had sole power because she named her baby son, Caesarion, as her co-ruler. (under Egyptian law a queen had to have a male co-ruler).Cleopatra did not kill her brother to have the throne; she already had the throne, but she had to share it with him as co-rulers. By killing him, she in effect had sole power because she named her baby son, Caesarion, as her co-ruler. (under Egyptian law a queen had to have a male co-ruler).Cleopatra did not kill her brother to have the throne; she already had the throne, but she had to share it with him as co-rulers. By killing him, she in effect had sole power because she named her baby son, Caesarion, as her co-ruler. (under Egyptian law a queen had to have a male co-ruler).Cleopatra did not kill her brother to have the throne; she already had the throne, but she had to share it with him as co-rulers. By killing him, she in effect had sole power because she named her baby son, Caesarion, as her co-ruler. (under Egyptian law a queen had to have a male co-ruler).Cleopatra did not kill her brother to have the throne; she already had the throne, but she had to share it with him as co-rulers. By killing him, she in effect had sole power because she named her baby son, Caesarion, as her co-ruler. (under Egyptian law a queen had to have a male co-ruler).Cleopatra did not kill her brother to have the throne; she already had the throne, but she had to share it with him as co-rulers. By killing him, she in effect had sole power because she named her baby son, Caesarion, as her co-ruler. (under Egyptian law a queen had to have a male co-ruler).
empire
The answer is EMPIRE. If ur in sixth grade, this is an answer to the ancient Mesopotamia Crossword puzzle!!! If you wanted the direct answer originally, then you should have typed in something else. I forgot what it was though! Sorry! :)
The Mandate Of Heaven was the way the kings were expected to rule. And the kings could be overthrown if they were an unwise ruler.
First the kings, who were replaced by the oligarchs, who were replaced by the tyrants, who were replaced by the demagogues under the democracy
King Alfred was powerful.He united the British under one King.His own Kingdom was called Wessex.
When? The city of Rome spanned roughly 1200 years and had various rulers under its three forms of government. There were kings, consuls and emperors and they all ruled Rome.
He expanded the Egyptian Empire and made Egypt powerful through war also he was their ruler for 66 years so it was stable.
He expanded the Egyptian Empire and made Egypt powerful through war also he was their ruler for 66 years so it was stable.
kings had higher rank but did not really have much power over lords.
No. It was under rule of Hindu Kings No. It was under rule of Hindu Kings
An absolute ruler in the empire under the republic form of government was a dictator. Under the principate the "emperor"was the absolute ruler at all times.
king john was a clever, cruel, and untrustworthy ruler who try to fight every one and lose to his three powerful enemy.