The farmers farmed the land, the priests ran the religion, the pharaohs ruled assisted by the nobility, the wormen bore and raised children and worked on the farms, and the slaves worked for them all.
As far as we know, they did not a standardized medium of exchange- that is Money. The Egyptian kingdom operated on a moneyless economy- though they did have a slave system ( possibly prisoners of war or of criminal cases) and a rigid caste structure- nothing along the lines of coinage, paper money- gold or silver ingots- or anything resembling Banks or Mints- have ever been recovered or dug up- in a country as thoroughly explored by archaeologists as Egypt. another oddity was they did not draw in perspective, despite the fact the Pyramid is one of the 5 Platonic solids! My Dad, who had some background as an art student, could never figure this one out!
In ancient times, the simple Varna system had degenerated into a rigid caste system. The high-caste Hindus developed hatred for the low-caste people, most of whom were branded as the Shudras or the Untouchables who were subjected to abject humiliation, suffering and misery. They were even not allowed to draw water from the public wells or to visit temples.
Roman Republic: -1 year term -1 patrician 1 plebian - citizens are adult males only United States: - 4 year term - one leader - citizens can be males/females/rich/poor
How did the Romans treated people they conquered?They would mostly leave them alone except if they didn't obey their rules.Rome Generally treated its defected enemies with justice.
Egypt today has no rigid social structure. However, there is certainly an entitled wealthy class and the lower class of working poor which predominates in most developing nations, for which Egypt is no exception.
It is because of the Nile River, they that it was a God. ;) lol jk What I meant was that the pharaoh kept it stable.
Ancient Egypt had three main social classes--upper, middle, and lower. The upper class consisted of the royal family, rich landowners, government officials, important priests and army officers, and doctors. ... Ancient Egypt's class system was not rigid. People in the lower or middle class could move to a higher position.
This is a statement. A statement can't be answered.
It is because of the Nile River, they that it was a God. ;) lol jk What I meant was that the pharaoh kept it stable.
The farmers farmed the land, the priests ran the religion, the pharaohs ruled assisted by the nobility, the wormen bore and raised children and worked on the farms, and the slaves worked for them all.
Sparta was a city-state in ancient Greece. One of the things it's well-known for is its rigid social structure. The main religion practiced in Sparta was Greek Polytheism.
During the postclassical era in India, the caste system was primarily a rigid social system. It was characterized by strict social hierarchy and limited social mobility based on birth. This rigid structure was reinforced by religious beliefs and societal norms.
Each social division is called a caste.
cast
caste
The Aryans used a system called varna to determine social class. Your social class was determined by birth, with four main varnas: Brahmins (priests and scholars), Kshatriyas (warriors and rulers), Vaishyas (farmers and merchants), and Shudras (laborers). This system was hierarchical and led to a rigid social structure in ancient Indian society.