Augustus is a very important figure in Roman history because of the several things he did. He began by ending the civil wars of the republic and taking supreme power. However the way he did this was a masterpiece of manipulation of the Roman legal system. He was fortunate to have able people surrounding him and advising him. He also literally rebuilt the city of Rome from the sewers to the temples and he established the period of time called the Pax Romana which was the basis for Rome's expansion and prosperity. He made social and military reforms and appointed capable men to the senate, rather than men who received their senatorial seat by family prominence.
Augustus also created the "Imperial" system of government in ancient Rome.
He was first roman emperor, and led the Romans in a long period of peace after annexing Egypt. However he was considered important because of the way he changed the form of Roman government, from the decaying republic to the principate. He also literally rebuilt the city of Rome itself--both its infrastructure and its outer appearances.
i dont know im asking you..
Roman God
Ulysses S. Grant
The Roman attitude towards science or scientific inventions was one of practicality. If the Romans had a need for an invention, they invented it and used it. The Greeks, on the other hand, would come up with an idea and follow through on it, and then try to figure out what to do with it. Of course this is a broad assessment of the two peoples, but an example of this is the Greek scientist from Alexandria who actually invented a working steam engine. The device was discarded because no one could figure out what to use it for. Another example is of the inventor who came to the emperor Vespasian with a labor saving device. Vespasian actually paid him not to market it because he didn't know what he would do with all the slaves it would put out of work.The Roman attitude towards science or scientific inventions was one of practicality. If the Romans had a need for an invention, they invented it and used it. The Greeks, on the other hand, would come up with an idea and follow through on it, and then try to figure out what to do with it. Of course this is a broad assessment of the two peoples, but an example of this is the Greek scientist from Alexandria who actually invented a working steam engine. The device was discarded because no one could figure out what to use it for. Another example is of the inventor who came to the emperor Vespasian with a labor saving device. Vespasian actually paid him not to market it because he didn't know what he would do with all the slaves it would put out of work.The Roman attitude towards science or scientific inventions was one of practicality. If the Romans had a need for an invention, they invented it and used it. The Greeks, on the other hand, would come up with an idea and follow through on it, and then try to figure out what to do with it. Of course this is a broad assessment of the two peoples, but an example of this is the Greek scientist from Alexandria who actually invented a working steam engine. The device was discarded because no one could figure out what to use it for. Another example is of the inventor who came to the emperor Vespasian with a labor saving device. Vespasian actually paid him not to market it because he didn't know what he would do with all the slaves it would put out of work.The Roman attitude towards science or scientific inventions was one of practicality. If the Romans had a need for an invention, they invented it and used it. The Greeks, on the other hand, would come up with an idea and follow through on it, and then try to figure out what to do with it. Of course this is a broad assessment of the two peoples, but an example of this is the Greek scientist from Alexandria who actually invented a working steam engine. The device was discarded because no one could figure out what to use it for. Another example is of the inventor who came to the emperor Vespasian with a labor saving device. Vespasian actually paid him not to market it because he didn't know what he would do with all the slaves it would put out of work.The Roman attitude towards science or scientific inventions was one of practicality. If the Romans had a need for an invention, they invented it and used it. The Greeks, on the other hand, would come up with an idea and follow through on it, and then try to figure out what to do with it. Of course this is a broad assessment of the two peoples, but an example of this is the Greek scientist from Alexandria who actually invented a working steam engine. The device was discarded because no one could figure out what to use it for. Another example is of the inventor who came to the emperor Vespasian with a labor saving device. Vespasian actually paid him not to market it because he didn't know what he would do with all the slaves it would put out of work.The Roman attitude towards science or scientific inventions was one of practicality. If the Romans had a need for an invention, they invented it and used it. The Greeks, on the other hand, would come up with an idea and follow through on it, and then try to figure out what to do with it. Of course this is a broad assessment of the two peoples, but an example of this is the Greek scientist from Alexandria who actually invented a working steam engine. The device was discarded because no one could figure out what to use it for. Another example is of the inventor who came to the emperor Vespasian with a labor saving device. Vespasian actually paid him not to market it because he didn't know what he would do with all the slaves it would put out of work.The Roman attitude towards science or scientific inventions was one of practicality. If the Romans had a need for an invention, they invented it and used it. The Greeks, on the other hand, would come up with an idea and follow through on it, and then try to figure out what to do with it. Of course this is a broad assessment of the two peoples, but an example of this is the Greek scientist from Alexandria who actually invented a working steam engine. The device was discarded because no one could figure out what to use it for. Another example is of the inventor who came to the emperor Vespasian with a labor saving device. Vespasian actually paid him not to market it because he didn't know what he would do with all the slaves it would put out of work.The Roman attitude towards science or scientific inventions was one of practicality. If the Romans had a need for an invention, they invented it and used it. The Greeks, on the other hand, would come up with an idea and follow through on it, and then try to figure out what to do with it. Of course this is a broad assessment of the two peoples, but an example of this is the Greek scientist from Alexandria who actually invented a working steam engine. The device was discarded because no one could figure out what to use it for. Another example is of the inventor who came to the emperor Vespasian with a labor saving device. Vespasian actually paid him not to market it because he didn't know what he would do with all the slaves it would put out of work.The Roman attitude towards science or scientific inventions was one of practicality. If the Romans had a need for an invention, they invented it and used it. The Greeks, on the other hand, would come up with an idea and follow through on it, and then try to figure out what to do with it. Of course this is a broad assessment of the two peoples, but an example of this is the Greek scientist from Alexandria who actually invented a working steam engine. The device was discarded because no one could figure out what to use it for. Another example is of the inventor who came to the emperor Vespasian with a labor saving device. Vespasian actually paid him not to market it because he didn't know what he would do with all the slaves it would put out of work.
Context clues are used to figure out the meaning of an unfamiliar word. When the meaning of a word is unknown, the way it is used and the words surrounding it can help a reader figure out what an unknown word means.
Augustus only patronized Virgil
Abraham Lincoln was an important figure in African-American history because he was the president who issued the Emancipation Proclamation, allowing all slaves to be free.
There is no widely recognized historical figure by the name of Augustus Constantine. It's possible you may be referring to Augustus, the first Roman emperor, and Constantine the Great, the Roman emperor who legalized Christianity. Both figures played significant roles in Roman history.
became the first emperor of Rome
thurgood marshaal was a good leader because he made history and more.........................
Samuel Adams was an important figure to American History because he was a founder of the Sons of Liberty, was the principal organizer of the Boston Tea Party, and he helped make the Declaration of Independence...Does that help? :)
Samuel Adams was an important figure to American History because he was a founder of the Sons of Liberty, was the principal organizer of the Boston Tea Party, and he helped make the Declaration of Independence...Does that help? :)
Expanded the Maya's western borders during his rule of nearly seven decades
Secret
Because he helped to create a style of jazz that had an impression on many artists of his time and many musicians today and yesterday alike. He is an important figure not only in music history but also in black history.
Anthony Augustus Kingscote was an English author known for his works on cricket. He co-wrote "I Zingari, 1861β1961" and "Cricket of To-day" with Sir Home Gordon. Kingscote was an influential figure in the early history of cricket writing.
a revalutionary figure is someone important in history that in any way changed history. E.g Martin Luther King, Barak Obama and William Blake