The Roman attitude towards science or scientific inventions was one of practicality. If the Romans had a need for an invention, they invented it and used it. The Greeks, on the other hand, would come up with an idea and follow through on it, and then try to figure out what to do with it. Of course this is a broad assessment of the two peoples, but an example of this is the Greek scientist from Alexandria who actually invented a working steam engine. The device was discarded because no one could figure out what to use it for. Another example is of the inventor who came to the emperor Vespasian with a labor saving device. Vespasian actually paid him not to market it because he didn't know what he would do with all the slaves it would put out of work.
The Roman attitude towards science or scientific inventions was one of practicality. If the Romans had a need for an invention, they invented it and used it. The Greeks, on the other hand, would come up with an idea and follow through on it, and then try to figure out what to do with it. Of course this is a broad assessment of the two peoples, but an example of this is the Greek scientist from Alexandria who actually invented a working steam engine. The device was discarded because no one could figure out what to use it for. Another example is of the inventor who came to the emperor Vespasian with a labor saving device. Vespasian actually paid him not to market it because he didn't know what he would do with all the slaves it would put out of work.
The Roman attitude towards science or scientific inventions was one of practicality. If the Romans had a need for an invention, they invented it and used it. The Greeks, on the other hand, would come up with an idea and follow through on it, and then try to figure out what to do with it. Of course this is a broad assessment of the two peoples, but an example of this is the Greek scientist from Alexandria who actually invented a working steam engine. The device was discarded because no one could figure out what to use it for. Another example is of the inventor who came to the emperor Vespasian with a labor saving device. Vespasian actually paid him not to market it because he didn't know what he would do with all the slaves it would put out of work.
The Roman attitude towards science or scientific inventions was one of practicality. If the Romans had a need for an invention, they invented it and used it. The Greeks, on the other hand, would come up with an idea and follow through on it, and then try to figure out what to do with it. Of course this is a broad assessment of the two peoples, but an example of this is the Greek scientist from Alexandria who actually invented a working steam engine. The device was discarded because no one could figure out what to use it for. Another example is of the inventor who came to the emperor Vespasian with a labor saving device. Vespasian actually paid him not to market it because he didn't know what he would do with all the slaves it would put out of work.
The Roman attitude towards science or scientific inventions was one of practicality. If the Romans had a need for an invention, they invented it and used it. The Greeks, on the other hand, would come up with an idea and follow through on it, and then try to figure out what to do with it. Of course this is a broad assessment of the two peoples, but an example of this is the Greek scientist from Alexandria who actually invented a working steam engine. The device was discarded because no one could figure out what to use it for. Another example is of the inventor who came to the emperor Vespasian with a labor saving device. Vespasian actually paid him not to market it because he didn't know what he would do with all the slaves it would put out of work.
The Roman attitude towards science or scientific inventions was one of practicality. If the Romans had a need for an invention, they invented it and used it. The Greeks, on the other hand, would come up with an idea and follow through on it, and then try to figure out what to do with it. Of course this is a broad assessment of the two peoples, but an example of this is the Greek scientist from Alexandria who actually invented a working steam engine. The device was discarded because no one could figure out what to use it for. Another example is of the inventor who came to the emperor Vespasian with a labor saving device. Vespasian actually paid him not to market it because he didn't know what he would do with all the slaves it would put out of work.
The Roman attitude towards science or scientific inventions was one of practicality. If the Romans had a need for an invention, they invented it and used it. The Greeks, on the other hand, would come up with an idea and follow through on it, and then try to figure out what to do with it. Of course this is a broad assessment of the two peoples, but an example of this is the Greek scientist from Alexandria who actually invented a working steam engine. The device was discarded because no one could figure out what to use it for. Another example is of the inventor who came to the emperor Vespasian with a labor saving device. Vespasian actually paid him not to market it because he didn't know what he would do with all the slaves it would put out of work.
The Roman attitude towards science or scientific inventions was one of practicality. If the Romans had a need for an invention, they invented it and used it. The Greeks, on the other hand, would come up with an idea and follow through on it, and then try to figure out what to do with it. Of course this is a broad assessment of the two peoples, but an example of this is the Greek scientist from Alexandria who actually invented a working steam engine. The device was discarded because no one could figure out what to use it for. Another example is of the inventor who came to the emperor Vespasian with a labor saving device. Vespasian actually paid him not to market it because he didn't know what he would do with all the slaves it would put out of work.
The Roman attitude towards science or scientific inventions was one of practicality. If the Romans had a need for an invention, they invented it and used it. The Greeks, on the other hand, would come up with an idea and follow through on it, and then try to figure out what to do with it. Of course this is a broad assessment of the two peoples, but an example of this is the Greek scientist from Alexandria who actually invented a working steam engine. The device was discarded because no one could figure out what to use it for. Another example is of the inventor who came to the emperor Vespasian with a labor saving device. Vespasian actually paid him not to market it because he didn't know what he would do with all the slaves it would put out of work.
Chat with our AI personalities
Whilst the Greeks were interested in theoretical science, especially in mathematics and geometry, the Romans were practical minded. They did not do much work in mathematics. Their greatest achievements were in medicine and engineering. The Romans also did some good work in natural sciences.
The Roman attitude towards science or scientific inventions was one of practicality. If the Romans had a need for an invention, they invented it and used it. The Greeks, on the other hand, would come up with an idea and follow through on it, and then try to figure out what to do with it. Of course this is a broad assessment of the two peoples, but an example of this is the Greek scientist from Alexandria who actually invented a working steam engine. The device was discarded because no one could figure out what to use it for. Another example is of the inventor who came to the emperor Vespasian with a labor saving device. Vespasian actually paid him not to market it because he didn't know what he would do with all the slaves it would put out of work.
how did the civilization of the Aztecs differ from other societies of North America
A dissenter
UNVA....?
Your question calls for an opinion, not a fact and opinions differ. Read the play "Julius Caesar" and form your own opinion.Your question calls for an opinion, not a fact and opinions differ. Read the play "Julius Caesar" and form your own opinion.Your question calls for an opinion, not a fact and opinions differ. Read the play "Julius Caesar" and form your own opinion.Your question calls for an opinion, not a fact and opinions differ. Read the play "Julius Caesar" and form your own opinion.Your question calls for an opinion, not a fact and opinions differ. Read the play "Julius Caesar" and form your own opinion.Your question calls for an opinion, not a fact and opinions differ. Read the play "Julius Caesar" and form your own opinion.Your question calls for an opinion, not a fact and opinions differ. Read the play "Julius Caesar" and form your own opinion.Your question calls for an opinion, not a fact and opinions differ. Read the play "Julius Caesar" and form your own opinion.Your question calls for an opinion, not a fact and opinions differ. Read the play "Julius Caesar" and form your own opinion.
A pussy no a dissenter