0
The Roman attitude towards science or scientific inventions was one of practicality. If the Romans had a need for an invention, they invented it and used it. The Greeks, on the other hand, would come up with an idea and follow through on it, and then try to figure out what to do with it. Of course this is a broad assessment of the two peoples, but an example of this is the Greek scientist from Alexandria who actually invented a working steam engine. The device was discarded because no one could figure out what to use it for. Another example is of the inventor who came to the emperor Vespasian with a labor saving device. Vespasian actually paid him not to market it because he didn't know what he would do with all the slaves it would put out of work.
The Roman attitude towards science or scientific inventions was one of practicality. If the Romans had a need for an invention, they invented it and used it. The Greeks, on the other hand, would come up with an idea and follow through on it, and then try to figure out what to do with it. Of course this is a broad assessment of the two peoples, but an example of this is the Greek scientist from Alexandria who actually invented a working steam engine. The device was discarded because no one could figure out what to use it for. Another example is of the inventor who came to the emperor Vespasian with a labor saving device. Vespasian actually paid him not to market it because he didn't know what he would do with all the slaves it would put out of work.
The Roman attitude towards science or scientific inventions was one of practicality. If the Romans had a need for an invention, they invented it and used it. The Greeks, on the other hand, would come up with an idea and follow through on it, and then try to figure out what to do with it. Of course this is a broad assessment of the two peoples, but an example of this is the Greek scientist from Alexandria who actually invented a working steam engine. The device was discarded because no one could figure out what to use it for. Another example is of the inventor who came to the emperor Vespasian with a labor saving device. Vespasian actually paid him not to market it because he didn't know what he would do with all the slaves it would put out of work.
The Roman attitude towards science or scientific inventions was one of practicality. If the Romans had a need for an invention, they invented it and used it. The Greeks, on the other hand, would come up with an idea and follow through on it, and then try to figure out what to do with it. Of course this is a broad assessment of the two peoples, but an example of this is the Greek scientist from Alexandria who actually invented a working steam engine. The device was discarded because no one could figure out what to use it for. Another example is of the inventor who came to the emperor Vespasian with a labor saving device. Vespasian actually paid him not to market it because he didn't know what he would do with all the slaves it would put out of work.
The Roman attitude towards science or scientific inventions was one of practicality. If the Romans had a need for an invention, they invented it and used it. The Greeks, on the other hand, would come up with an idea and follow through on it, and then try to figure out what to do with it. Of course this is a broad assessment of the two peoples, but an example of this is the Greek scientist from Alexandria who actually invented a working steam engine. The device was discarded because no one could figure out what to use it for. Another example is of the inventor who came to the emperor Vespasian with a labor saving device. Vespasian actually paid him not to market it because he didn't know what he would do with all the slaves it would put out of work.
The Roman attitude towards science or scientific inventions was one of practicality. If the Romans had a need for an invention, they invented it and used it. The Greeks, on the other hand, would come up with an idea and follow through on it, and then try to figure out what to do with it. Of course this is a broad assessment of the two peoples, but an example of this is the Greek scientist from Alexandria who actually invented a working steam engine. The device was discarded because no one could figure out what to use it for. Another example is of the inventor who came to the emperor Vespasian with a labor saving device. Vespasian actually paid him not to market it because he didn't know what he would do with all the slaves it would put out of work.
The Roman attitude towards science or scientific inventions was one of practicality. If the Romans had a need for an invention, they invented it and used it. The Greeks, on the other hand, would come up with an idea and follow through on it, and then try to figure out what to do with it. Of course this is a broad assessment of the two peoples, but an example of this is the Greek scientist from Alexandria who actually invented a working steam engine. The device was discarded because no one could figure out what to use it for. Another example is of the inventor who came to the emperor Vespasian with a labor saving device. Vespasian actually paid him not to market it because he didn't know what he would do with all the slaves it would put out of work.
The Roman attitude towards science or scientific inventions was one of practicality. If the Romans had a need for an invention, they invented it and used it. The Greeks, on the other hand, would come up with an idea and follow through on it, and then try to figure out what to do with it. Of course this is a broad assessment of the two peoples, but an example of this is the Greek scientist from Alexandria who actually invented a working steam engine. The device was discarded because no one could figure out what to use it for. Another example is of the inventor who came to the emperor Vespasian with a labor saving device. Vespasian actually paid him not to market it because he didn't know what he would do with all the slaves it would put out of work.
The Roman attitude towards science or scientific inventions was one of practicality. If the Romans had a need for an invention, they invented it and used it. The Greeks, on the other hand, would come up with an idea and follow through on it, and then try to figure out what to do with it. Of course this is a broad assessment of the two peoples, but an example of this is the Greek scientist from Alexandria who actually invented a working steam engine. The device was discarded because no one could figure out what to use it for. Another example is of the inventor who came to the emperor Vespasian with a labor saving device. Vespasian actually paid him not to market it because he didn't know what he would do with all the slaves it would put out of work.
Whilst the Greeks were interested in theoretical science, especially in mathematics and geometry, the Romans were practical minded. They did not do much work in mathematics. Their greatest achievements were in medicine and engineering. The Romans also did some good work in natural sciences.
The Roman attitude towards science or scientific inventions was one of practicality. If the Romans had a need for an invention, they invented it and used it. The Greeks, on the other hand, would come up with an idea and follow through on it, and then try to figure out what to do with it. Of course this is a broad assessment of the two peoples, but an example of this is the Greek scientist from Alexandria who actually invented a working steam engine. The device was discarded because no one could figure out what to use it for. Another example is of the inventor who came to the emperor Vespasian with a labor saving device. Vespasian actually paid him not to market it because he didn't know what he would do with all the slaves it would put out of work.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How did the civilization of the Aztecs differ from the other societies of North America?
how did the civilization of the Aztecs differ from other societies of North America
A person whose views differ from others?
A dissenter
How did Renaissance states differ from medieval monarchies?
UNVA....?
What is your response to the statement brutus is an honorable man?
Your question calls for an opinion, not a fact and opinions differ. Read the play "Julius Caesar" and form your own opinion.Your question calls for an opinion, not a fact and opinions differ. Read the play "Julius Caesar" and form your own opinion.Your question calls for an opinion, not a fact and opinions differ. Read the play "Julius Caesar" and form your own opinion.Your question calls for an opinion, not a fact and opinions differ. Read the play "Julius Caesar" and form your own opinion.Your question calls for an opinion, not a fact and opinions differ. Read the play "Julius Caesar" and form your own opinion.Your question calls for an opinion, not a fact and opinions differ. Read the play "Julius Caesar" and form your own opinion.Your question calls for an opinion, not a fact and opinions differ. Read the play "Julius Caesar" and form your own opinion.Your question calls for an opinion, not a fact and opinions differ. Read the play "Julius Caesar" and form your own opinion.Your question calls for an opinion, not a fact and opinions differ. Read the play "Julius Caesar" and form your own opinion.
What is a person whose views differ from others'?
A pussy no a dissenter
How did the Romans differ from the Greeks in their art that show the human body?
The Greeks created it. The Romans copied them.
How did the Greeks and Romans differ in their view of ares?
The Greeks and Romans differ in their view of Ares in that the Greeks viewed him solely as a violent God. He is known as the God of war but had many other attributes in Roman lore.
How did the Roman differ from the Greek in their art that shows that humans body?
The Greeks created it. The Romans copied them.
how did Romans sculpture differ from earlier G reek sculpture?
The Romans modelled their statues on those of the Greeks. Some statues were replicas of Greek originals. However, they often blended a variety of traditions The Romans liked to blend artistic traditions from Italy and the rest of the empire.
How does astrology considered a pseudo-science differ from true science?
It doesnt-its based on the same deductive reasoning as the accepted sciences Its also closely related to astronomy and physics its just that religion has distorted the image and society has not promoted it in schools However some countrys base their culture on astrology as the Romans and Greeks did Our library system has put it in section 130 and their are worldwide many associations of this science
How did the Roman's attitude toward religion differ from the Jews attitude?
The Romans were very religious. Their religion was very different. It was polytheistic; that is, it had many gods. There were many rites to many of the gods and there were ceremonies of fertility, purification and exorcism. The Roman calendar was full of religious festivals. For the Romans religion was a matter of observing rituals. They did not have a theology. They had myths associated with the gods and religious observances and traditions.
Greeks differ from other ancient peoples?
Greeks better insure to be differed for other ancient peoples
Was Mars more honarable and intelligent then Ares?
Mars is the Roman God of War and Ares is the Greek God of War and Bloodshed. Though they differ in name, they are just the same God of war and only differs to what the Romans and Greeks believe in.
How do the three writers differ in their attitude toward immigrants?
get money hump females
How do science disciplines differ from one another?
Science disciplines differ from one another in terms of exactness. While some sciences can be absolute, such as chemistry, the science of psychology is nowhere near to being an exact science.
How did the Greek idea about mime differ from that of the Romans?
find out your self and tell me
How do posters differ differ from research reports in science journals?
posters are not peer reviewed.
