answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Roman law was based on the principle of rights, the rights of citizens.

User Avatar

Wiki User

7y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

yes it did

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Did the ancient Roman legal system stress the rights of the individual over the authority of the government?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about History of Western Civilization

Why do Roman Fathers have power over their families?

The Family Has Power And Authority over the whole family. He had the rights to execute his children if he wished.


What of one of two houses of the Roman republic which consisted of regular middle-class male citizens of Rome?

The ancient Romans did not have two houses of government during the republic. They had the senate and the elected officials. The regular citizens were the voters who elected the officials. They were called the Assemblies but were not exclusively middle-classed citizens. The wealthy had voting rights too.The ancient Romans did not have two houses of government during the republic. They had the senate and the elected officials. The regular citizens were the voters who elected the officials. They were called the Assemblies but were not exclusively middle-classed citizens. The wealthy had voting rights too.The ancient Romans did not have two houses of government during the republic. They had the senate and the elected officials. The regular citizens were the voters who elected the officials. They were called the Assemblies but were not exclusively middle-classed citizens. The wealthy had voting rights too.The ancient Romans did not have two houses of government during the republic. They had the senate and the elected officials. The regular citizens were the voters who elected the officials. They were called the Assemblies but were not exclusively middle-classed citizens. The wealthy had voting rights too.The ancient Romans did not have two houses of government during the republic. They had the senate and the elected officials. The regular citizens were the voters who elected the officials. They were called the Assemblies but were not exclusively middle-classed citizens. The wealthy had voting rights too.The ancient Romans did not have two houses of government during the republic. They had the senate and the elected officials. The regular citizens were the voters who elected the officials. They were called the Assemblies but were not exclusively middle-classed citizens. The wealthy had voting rights too.The ancient Romans did not have two houses of government during the republic. They had the senate and the elected officials. The regular citizens were the voters who elected the officials. They were called the Assemblies but were not exclusively middle-classed citizens. The wealthy had voting rights too.The ancient Romans did not have two houses of government during the republic. They had the senate and the elected officials. The regular citizens were the voters who elected the officials. They were called the Assemblies but were not exclusively middle-classed citizens. The wealthy had voting rights too.The ancient Romans did not have two houses of government during the republic. They had the senate and the elected officials. The regular citizens were the voters who elected the officials. They were called the Assemblies but were not exclusively middle-classed citizens. The wealthy had voting rights too.


Why did the Romans change their government from monarchy to republic?

They wanted to have more rights and to chose those rights themselves.


In Roman government who represented the rights of the plebeians?

The rights of the plebeians were represented by the tribunes.


What was Jean-Jacques Rousseau's contribution to the Enlightenment during the 17th century?

His philosophy influenced the Enlightenment in France and across Europe, and also was important to elements of the French Revolution. He argued for a society based on reason rather than faith, and created a new social contract (like John Locke) in Discourse on Inequality. Both philosophers agreed that a social contract created between a government and the governed, in which a government's authority relies on the consent of the governed, was necessary for people to live in society. Both of their social contracts rest on the idea of natural rights, which is that everyone is born with a certain set of rights and the government exists to protect those rights.

Related questions

Did the ancient roman legal system stress the rights of the individual or the authority of the government?

false


The ancient roman legal system stressed the rights of the individual over the authority of the government?

Yes, Roman law was based on the principle of the rights of citizens.


Did the ancient Rome legal system stress the rights of the individual over the authority of the government?

Yes, Roman law was based on the principle of citizen rights


The basic function of government is to cause citizens to?

lawGive up individual rights to a central authority.


The contemporary debate over the Supreme Courts role is really about a proper balance between?

Government authority versus individual rights


How do the amendments to the Constitution preserve individual rights?

All of them. If you want to be more specific, the first amendment protects the individual's right to freedom of speech, religion, and to question the government's authority by petitioning and assembling peaceful protests. The second amendment protects the individual's right to own weapons. The fourth amendment protects the individual's right to privacy. Read the Bill of Rights, my friend. It's all there.


How do constitutional rights impact individual rights?

They prevent the government from abusing the individual.


What mainly stood in the way of the costitutions approval?

lack of constitutional authority


What do the individual rights do?

Individual rights are distinct from civil or legal rights as these are rights granted by government to citizens and will vary with the organization and administration of governments. Individual rights identify a boundary of just social interactions in presence or absence of government.


Why did many leaders insist The Bill of Rights be added to the constitution?

To protect individual rights in order to avoid any single power or entity within the government from having too much authority.


How does the Constitution protect individual rights?

The Constitution protects freedom in many ways. here are three ways.It sets up a fair form of government. You can't be free without justice.It sets up rules for the government to work within by creating boundaries for state government laws and federal government laws (see the 10th amendment).The Bill of Rights outlines freedom and rights preserved for the individual (some have previously argued that this is the only part of the constitution that protects individual rights).


How do President Jackson stood up for the rights of states but acted forcefully to protect?

He acted to protect the authority of the federal government.