0
What else can I help you with?
How have notions of legitimate authority and followership changed across different periods of Western history?
Throughout Western history, notions of legitimate authority and followership have evolved significantly. In ancient times, authority often stemmed from divine right or monarchy, where rulers were seen as chosen by God. The Enlightenment introduced ideas of rationalism and individual rights, shifting authority to democratic principles and the consent of the governed. In contemporary society, authority is increasingly questioned and decentralized, with a focus on participatory governance and social movements challenging traditional power structures.
Why do Roman Fathers have power over their families?
The Family Has Power And Authority over the whole family. He had the rights to execute his children if he wished.
What of one of two houses of the Roman republic which consisted of regular middle-class male citizens of Rome?
The ancient Romans did not have two houses of government during the republic. They had the senate and the elected officials. The regular citizens were the voters who elected the officials. They were called the Assemblies but were not exclusively middle-classed citizens. The wealthy had voting rights too.The ancient Romans did not have two houses of government during the republic. They had the senate and the elected officials. The regular citizens were the voters who elected the officials. They were called the Assemblies but were not exclusively middle-classed citizens. The wealthy had voting rights too.The ancient Romans did not have two houses of government during the republic. They had the senate and the elected officials. The regular citizens were the voters who elected the officials. They were called the Assemblies but were not exclusively middle-classed citizens. The wealthy had voting rights too.The ancient Romans did not have two houses of government during the republic. They had the senate and the elected officials. The regular citizens were the voters who elected the officials. They were called the Assemblies but were not exclusively middle-classed citizens. The wealthy had voting rights too.The ancient Romans did not have two houses of government during the republic. They had the senate and the elected officials. The regular citizens were the voters who elected the officials. They were called the Assemblies but were not exclusively middle-classed citizens. The wealthy had voting rights too.The ancient Romans did not have two houses of government during the republic. They had the senate and the elected officials. The regular citizens were the voters who elected the officials. They were called the Assemblies but were not exclusively middle-classed citizens. The wealthy had voting rights too.The ancient Romans did not have two houses of government during the republic. They had the senate and the elected officials. The regular citizens were the voters who elected the officials. They were called the Assemblies but were not exclusively middle-classed citizens. The wealthy had voting rights too.The ancient Romans did not have two houses of government during the republic. They had the senate and the elected officials. The regular citizens were the voters who elected the officials. They were called the Assemblies but were not exclusively middle-classed citizens. The wealthy had voting rights too.The ancient Romans did not have two houses of government during the republic. They had the senate and the elected officials. The regular citizens were the voters who elected the officials. They were called the Assemblies but were not exclusively middle-classed citizens. The wealthy had voting rights too.
Why did the Romans change their government from monarchy to republic?
They wanted to have more rights and to chose those rights themselves.
In Roman government who represented the rights of the plebeians?
The rights of the plebeians were represented by the tribunes.
Did the ancient roman legal system stress the rights of the individual or the authority of the government?
false
Did the ancient Rome legal system stress the rights of the individual over the authority of the government?
Yes, Roman law was based on the principle of citizen rights
The ancient roman legal system stressed the rights of the individual over the authority of the government?
Yes, Roman law was based on the principle of the rights of citizens.
The basic function of government is to cause citizens to?
lawGive up individual rights to a central authority.
The contemporary debate over the Supreme Courts role is really about a proper balance between?
Government authority versus individual rights
How do the amendments to the Constitution preserve individual rights?
All of them. If you want to be more specific, the first amendment protects the individual's right to freedom of speech, religion, and to question the government's authority by petitioning and assembling peaceful protests. The second amendment protects the individual's right to own weapons. The fourth amendment protects the individual's right to privacy. Read the Bill of Rights, my friend. It's all there.
How do constitutional rights impact individual rights?
They prevent the government from abusing the individual.
What mainly stood in the way of the costitutions approval?
lack of constitutional authority
Why did many leaders insist The Bill of Rights be added to the constitution?
To protect individual rights in order to avoid any single power or entity within the government from having too much authority.
What do the individual rights do?
Individual rights are distinct from civil or legal rights as these are rights granted by government to citizens and will vary with the organization and administration of governments. Individual rights identify a boundary of just social interactions in presence or absence of government.
How does the Constitution protect individual rights?
The Constitution protects freedom in many ways. here are three ways.It sets up a fair form of government. You can't be free without justice.It sets up rules for the government to work within by creating boundaries for state government laws and federal government laws (see the 10th amendment).The Bill of Rights outlines freedom and rights preserved for the individual (some have previously argued that this is the only part of the constitution that protects individual rights).
What is an overall theme about government that is communicated by the preamble and the Bill of Rights?
An overall theme communicated by the Preamble and the Bill of Rights is the importance of protecting individual liberties while promoting the common good. The Preamble emphasizes the establishment of a government that ensures justice, tranquility, and the welfare of its citizens. Meanwhile, the Bill of Rights safeguards personal freedoms and limits government power, highlighting the balance between authority and individual rights. Together, they reflect a vision of government as a protector of democracy and civil liberties.
