0
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How did the roman aristocracy come into power?
It is thought that two main factors led to the patrician aristocracy to come into power. One factor was that their clans claimed descent from the original senators of Rome. Romulus, the founder of Rome, was said to have selected 100 pater familias (fathers of the family, heads of the household) form the leading clans of Rome at the time to seat in the senate, which was the advisory body of the king, a council of elders (senate comes from the word senex, old man). This gave the patricians a claim of ancestral entitlement to authority and the prestige of an ancestry which was supposed to go back to the beginning of Rome. The term patrician was derived from pater (familias). They were the 'fathers' (of the city) and were often called paters. The other factor was that they came to monopolise the priesthoods during the years of their formation. This was very important because religion regulated many aspects of private, public, political and military life. For example, several political process, and even war, had to start after the taking of the auspices (divination of the omens of the gods). The kings of Rome also had priestly functions; they were also augurs (performers of auspices). When the king died, his auspice was reverted back to the senators, who were the ultimate holders of the auspices. The senators also selected the candidate for the next kingship and when the new king was elected, they conferred auspice on the king. In the Republic, the priestly senators conferred auspice on top officers of state. Thus, the priesthoods gave the patricians great authority and political influence. The very early Roman state was based on religion. The foundation of the rules of public life was religion. There was not a differentiation between private or public law and the religious rules which regulated society. This made the early patricians the legal experts of the city (through their knowledge of religious rules and procedures, which they kept secret) and the holders of legal authority. It gave the patrician aristocracy enormous political authority. Originally, the senators also had the power to overturn laws on the ground of religious technicalities (through the auctoritas senatus, a pronouncement of the senate on laws) This changed over the centuries as the growth secular laws and rules and of secular administrative offices greatly decreased the political importance of religion and religious authority.
How did Rome fall?
The ancient Roman Empire fell because it was unable to logistically maintain its military supremacy in Europe. This was despite the de facto control of the government by military leaders in place of the Emperor. After the fall of Rome to Germanic mercenaries in 476 AD, the eastern or Byzantine Empire continued for another 1,000 years until conquered by the Ottomans in the 1400's.In Some DetailThe Western Roman Empire which was ruled by the City of Rome fell because of the lack of manpower to defend its borders from Barbarians who all wanted a piece of the Roman Land. Bad Emperor after Bad Emperor was put on the throne. Each Legion of the Roman Army wanted one of their own people on the throne. Finally, Constantine became Emperor and moved the Capital to Constantinople (modern day Istanbul). While this happened, the Western Empire was put into ruin. More and More often the Western Roman Empire was forced to make deals with the Barbarians who said that they would defend the Western Roman Empire if they were allowed to live in Roman territories.One day Alaric, leader of the Visigoth, realized that Roman Forces were spread thinly in the Empire and in AD 410 he and his Army began to cautiously move South and into Italy. The Romans might have just withdrawn to the Italian Peninsula and held that for another 100-200 years until they had the manpower to retake Europe. But instead, the Roman Army let the barbarians move unopposed through Italy. When they finally reached the city of Rome, they sacked the city. Other barbarians came and attacked the city, but the City of Rome finally stayed out of Roman hands when Romulus Augustus became Emperor of Rome. When Romulus was removed from power in 476 AD, the emperor Zeno of the Eastern Empire accepted the Germanic chieftain Odoacer as ruler of Italy. This marked the end of the Western Roman Empire. :P
How did rome influence the US?
its a simple question that, with enough knowledge of rome, is obvious, but to answer your question rome was a Democracy, actually a republic/ democracy, who ellected there officials. take the ellectoral colleges today for example. when the first king of rome, Romulus, died, the 100 senitors (Chosen by Romulus) would have trouble finding a new one so they gave the power of choice to the people, but in exchange for giving them the power, they would decided if there choice was wise and they would really decied who was to be king if the people had, acording to the senate, chosen a bad polotician or someone the senate thought was not fit to be the king of rome. this continues throught the empire, even after the age of the republic when the emporers take charge, the senate remained, simply because they thought that one man with all the power could not govern a vast empire such as the roman empire. even tho an emperor exsisted amongst them elections still took place. the people ellected senators, goveners, and etc. they also had three branches of government the LEGISTRATIVE, JUDICIAL, and EXECUTIVE. so these are just few examples. i hope this help ;)
What political practice from Greek democracy did the Roman Republic copy?
There are many answers to this question. Rome took the idea of trial by jury of one's peers, from the Greeks (specifically Athens). Rome also took the idea that decisions can and should be made by what we now call, an electorate; a body of people who have the right to vote on proposed laws, administrative actions, and state policy. Rome used the idea of citizenship, which was created by the Greeks, to expand the republican empire, and reduce civil strife among the people it had conquered. Also, while Rome did not explicitly take this last practice, Rome did utilize a watered down form. In Athens, there was a practice called ostracism, where every year, the Athenians would vote on who they thought was too popular, irresponsible, and most likely to try to harm the Athenian Democracy, and the person who gained the most votes, was exiled from Athens. In Rome, exile was used as a form of punishment, mainly for people of power and ability. People who were exiled were forbidden from entering the precincts of Rome, and so their skills, abilities and power were put to use elsewhere in the empire. This practice allowed the state to gain the exiled person's benefits on the local economy, and such, while publicly punishing the person. The Romans did not copy any Greek democratic practice. · Vote by the people gathered in an assembly of the people to elect (originally) the king started right from the beginning, long before contact with Greek political ideas. · The Roman popular assemblies never voted on administrative action and state policy. These were the preserve of the kings, at first, and of the consuls in the Republic. · The idea of citizenship was not a Greek invention and existed in a number of civilisations. Again, the Romans developed the concept of citizenship very early on, long before contact with Greek political ideas. · Exiling people who were not politically desirable was common in ancient civilisations and was specific neither the Romans nor the Greeks. Rome practiced this long before Athens introduced ostracism. The Romans were not interested in Greek principles of democracy and never tried to introduce them. The Roman Republic and the Athenian democracy were established at around the same time. Three Romans were said to have been sent to Athens 55 years after the foundation of the Republic to copy the law of Solon. This law was over 100 years old and established a timocracy (power by the propertied classes) rather than democracy. The Romans ignored the contemporary democratic institutions in Athens. There never were any discussions about democracy. The Republic was at first controlled by the patrician aristocracy and later by a patrician-(rich) plebeian oligarchy. Democracy (which for the Greeks meant power by the people) would have been seen as too subversive by the oligarchy. Despite voting on laws and electing the officers of state, the popular assemblies were meant to hold very little influenced in this oligarchy.
Why is a centurion called a centurion if he only commands around 80 men?
It is thought that the title "centurion" originated from the voting assemblies of early Rome called the "centuria" and not from the Latin word "centum" meaning one hundred. However it is possible that in the early days a centurion actually did command 100 men, but the army was changed and reformed over the years and divided differently. But the army, being the army, still kept the old titles.It is thought that the title "centurion" originated from the voting assemblies of early Rome called the "centuria" and not from the Latin word "centum" meaning one hundred. However it is possible that in the early days a centurion actually did command 100 men, but the army was changed and reformed over the years and divided differently. But the army, being the army, still kept the old titles.It is thought that the title "centurion" originated from the voting assemblies of early Rome called the "centuria" and not from the Latin word "centum" meaning one hundred. However it is possible that in the early days a centurion actually did command 100 men, but the army was changed and reformed over the years and divided differently. But the army, being the army, still kept the old titles.It is thought that the title "centurion" originated from the voting assemblies of early Rome called the "centuria" and not from the Latin word "centum" meaning one hundred. However it is possible that in the early days a centurion actually did command 100 men, but the army was changed and reformed over the years and divided differently. But the army, being the army, still kept the old titles.It is thought that the title "centurion" originated from the voting assemblies of early Rome called the "centuria" and not from the Latin word "centum" meaning one hundred. However it is possible that in the early days a centurion actually did command 100 men, but the army was changed and reformed over the years and divided differently. But the army, being the army, still kept the old titles.It is thought that the title "centurion" originated from the voting assemblies of early Rome called the "centuria" and not from the Latin word "centum" meaning one hundred. However it is possible that in the early days a centurion actually did command 100 men, but the army was changed and reformed over the years and divided differently. But the army, being the army, still kept the old titles.It is thought that the title "centurion" originated from the voting assemblies of early Rome called the "centuria" and not from the Latin word "centum" meaning one hundred. However it is possible that in the early days a centurion actually did command 100 men, but the army was changed and reformed over the years and divided differently. But the army, being the army, still kept the old titles.It is thought that the title "centurion" originated from the voting assemblies of early Rome called the "centuria" and not from the Latin word "centum" meaning one hundred. However it is possible that in the early days a centurion actually did command 100 men, but the army was changed and reformed over the years and divided differently. But the army, being the army, still kept the old titles.It is thought that the title "centurion" originated from the voting assemblies of early Rome called the "centuria" and not from the Latin word "centum" meaning one hundred. However it is possible that in the early days a centurion actually did command 100 men, but the army was changed and reformed over the years and divided differently. But the army, being the army, still kept the old titles.
Why did Romulus set a senate up instead of a monarchy?
Romulus did set up a monarchy. He was the first king of Rome. He set up the senate as his royal advisory body. It was a council of elders. Senatus (senate) was derived from senex, old man. He appointed 100 patres falmilias (heads of the household) from the leading clans of Rome to seat in the senate.
What new empire was growing in power during the 100 bc?
rome
Who was the most powerful governing body of Rome How many members did it have?
The most powerful governing body of Rome was the Senate, which had 900 members. Normally there were about 100 to 200 active senators at one time.
How many are voting members of the senate?
The US Senate had 100 voting members, 2 from each state. Once in a while a vacancy occurs and the Senate may be short some of its members for a little while.
Who holds the power to approve Supreme Court Justuces?
requires a 51 of 100 (majority) vote by the senate
What does patricians do mean ancient Rome?
The patricians were the aristocracy of ancient Rome. The name is derived from the term pater familias (father of the family/head of the household) and from the creation of the senate by Romulus, Rome's founder and first king. Romulus created a council of elders (senate is derived from senex, the Latin for old man) to act as the royal advisory body. He selected 100 pater familias from the leading clans of Rome at the time to seat in the senate. The members of these clans then called themselves patres (plural of pater) a term which implied that they were the fathers of the city.
How many member in the senate?
there are 100 members in the senate
Does the senate have 100 members?
Yes, Senate has 100 members: two from each of the 50 states.
How many member are in the senate?
There are 100 members of the U.S. Senate, because there are 2 representatives from each of the 50 states.
How many members are there in the Senate?
There are 100 voting members in the Senate.
How many representatives are there in the senate?
there are 100 representatives in the us senate
How did Augustus bring peace to Rome?
He took on the powers of a tribune of the plebsin the city and pro-magistrate outside the city, which gave him over-riding authority while still keeping the Senate to front as government. He took control of the frontier provinces, leaving the Senate in control of the remainder - the frontir ones had the legions, so he kept them out of the hands of over-ambitious senators who had been the originators of the revolutions of the previous century. He put the brakes on territorial expansion, establishing defendable frontiers and establishing diplomatic relations with neighbouring states.
