0
It started 753 B.C. and i believe it ended 509 B.C. because that's when the Roman Republic started.
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Wiki User
∙ 11y agoThe Roman monarchy began with the mythical Romulus founding the city and becoming the first king.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What does Eusebius's believe is the best form of government in the roman empire?
Monarchy. :)
What type of government did rome start with?
Roman government started with a monarchy.
Which government preceded did the roman republic pass on to future civilizations?
The phrasing is unclear. The form of government which preceded the Roman Republic was the Roman Monarchy. The Republic was followed by rule by emperors. However, the Republic did not pass this on to future civilisations because: 1) it was the collapse of the Republic, rather than some sort of handover; 2) no future civilisation tried to replicate Rome's period of rule by emperors or, for that matter, the Roman Monarchy.
What are the 3 periods of Roman history and why were they divided this way?
The three periods of Roman history were the monarchy, the republic and the principate. They were divided this way by the types of government in those periods.
How was the roman republican different from the Estrcan rule?
The Roman republic was a democracy in which the government leaders were elected by the people to speak for them and to rule them. The Etruscan rule was that of a monarchy in which one man ruled and his word was law no matter what the people wanted.The Roman republic was a democracy in which the government leaders were elected by the people to speak for them and to rule them. The Etruscan rule was that of a monarchy in which one man ruled and his word was law no matter what the people wanted.The Roman republic was a democracy in which the government leaders were elected by the people to speak for them and to rule them. The Etruscan rule was that of a monarchy in which one man ruled and his word was law no matter what the people wanted.The Roman republic was a democracy in which the government leaders were elected by the people to speak for them and to rule them. The Etruscan rule was that of a monarchy in which one man ruled and his word was law no matter what the people wanted.The Roman republic was a democracy in which the government leaders were elected by the people to speak for them and to rule them. The Etruscan rule was that of a monarchy in which one man ruled and his word was law no matter what the people wanted.The Roman republic was a democracy in which the government leaders were elected by the people to speak for them and to rule them. The Etruscan rule was that of a monarchy in which one man ruled and his word was law no matter what the people wanted.The Roman republic was a democracy in which the government leaders were elected by the people to speak for them and to rule them. The Etruscan rule was that of a monarchy in which one man ruled and his word was law no matter what the people wanted.The Roman republic was a democracy in which the government leaders were elected by the people to speak for them and to rule them. The Etruscan rule was that of a monarchy in which one man ruled and his word was law no matter what the people wanted.The Roman republic was a democracy in which the government leaders were elected by the people to speak for them and to rule them. The Etruscan rule was that of a monarchy in which one man ruled and his word was law no matter what the people wanted.
The early roman government was a-?
The early Roman government was a monarchy (for 244 years, 753-509 B.C.).
Is it true that the roman republic was not much like a constitutional monarchy?
The Roman republic was a republic. There was no monarchy, constitutional or otherwise.
What are some limitations of the monarchy of the roman republic?
A Republic is not a monarchy, it does not have a king. Several republics were formed when a monarchy was overthrown. The Roman Republic was one such case. They got rid of the kings
What was not a part of the Roman REPBULIC?
Monarchy.
What period in roman history was characterized by having one supreme ruler?
There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.
How long did the Roman Morachy last?
The Roman monarchy lasted about 243 years.
What was the roman monarchy?
wher the king or queen rules.
Who changed the roman empire into absolute monarchy?
Diocletian
Did early Rome begin as a republic?
No, early Rome was a monarchy.
What happen in 509 BIC Rome?
The Roman monarchy was overthrown, which started the era of the Roman Republic.
Which Roman era lasted the longest the Roman monarchy the Roman Republic the Western Roman Empire or the Byzantine Empire?
The Byzantine Empire lasted for a millennium.
Did the English monarchy begin before parliament?
Yes. Centuries before.
