The church was a very important part of the feudal system. It played an immense role in the lives of people and superseded governments. The Catholic Church was the only Christian religion in Europe and taught that man was born in sin and it was only through them that man could go to heaven. The Pope was the head of the church and was very rich and very powerful. He had authority over kings and queens in religious matters as well in government. There was no separation of church and state.
Religion provided a third hierarchy to balance those of the king-noble-retainer-peasant feudal arrangement and that of the civil/merchant class. Each of these allowed an individual to rise in society to some degree. There was always something of a cold war (sometimes heating up) among these three, with a Duke sometimes being more important that a Bishop and both more important that a Mayor. At other times, Popes outranked Kings and a Lord Mayor being the equal of an Archbishop.
A:
The Catholic Church itself became a feudal lord in the eighth century - and to some extent even earlier - and the popes expended much of their time and resources attempting to increase the extent of their domains. The very fact that Pope Stephen II would have used the 'Donation of Constantine', which he almost certainly knew to be a recent forgery, to acquire the papal states is evidence of the papal view of feudalism. In the broader context, the popes saw feudalism as the natural order of things, with the pope as supreme, kings, cardinals and princes next, and so on down the line. Anything that broke this natural order of things could undermine the pope's authority.
Monks were not part of the feudal system. They were part of the Church clergy and held no land of their own; they owed no feudal obligation to any overlord and were not governed by the king's law.The Church as an institution held land and might also have manors, peasants and knights owing feudal obligations to an abbot or bishop, but monks were in no way connected with any of this.
The chivalric code was a code in Feudal society that nobles adhered to. The chivalric code was essential in Feudal society because it made the feudal contract meaning. Part of the code was being honest and breaking a feudal oath was unacceptable socially.
Western europe
The Church provided a sense of stability, unity, and order.Roman Catholic AnswerThe Middle Ages in Europe were a time of intense Catholicism. The people were very devout and their entire lives revolved around the Church. Many young people entered religious orders and for the most part family life revolved around the local parish Church. Spiritually, the people in the Middle Ages were far advanced from the spiritual morass in whicht our world currently finds itself.
Eastern Europe
A noble was part of the feudal system in Europe. The Feudal system was a type of governemnt formed in a hierartrical system. For example, those in the highest rank such as the Church and the King or Queen (matriarch) controlled everything. Then there were nobles, knights, lords, peasants, and serfs (from top to bottom of the feudal system not including the matriarch or king).
Archbishop Thomas Becket was one of two archbishops in England. He was therefore at the very top rank of the Church in this country, but as a member of the Church he was not part of the feudal system directly.
Monks were not part of the feudal system. They were part of the Church clergy and held no land of their own; they owed no feudal obligation to any overlord and were not governed by the king's law.The Church as an institution held land and might also have manors, peasants and knights owing feudal obligations to an abbot or bishop, but monks were in no way connected with any of this.
A peasant owned no land, so they weren't directly a part of the feudal system. Many peasants worked on lands owned by knights or nobles.
Pawns were definitely not part of the feudal system. They were and still are pieces used in the game of chess.
I am not sure I understand your question. If you mean rank he was lower rank, but a bit better off than a peasant. If you mean area of Europe then he could be from any part.
It decimated the population and brought about the end of the feudal system.
The relationship between a vassal and the church was the same as the relationship between any other secular person and the church. The vassal was part of the feudal hierarchy, and the church had a separate hierarchy.
Pilgrims were individuals who undertook religious journeys for spiritual reasons and were not directly tied to the feudal system, which was a social structure based on land ownership and obligations. While some pilgrims may have interacted with the feudal society during their travels, their primary purpose was religious devotion rather than a formal part of the feudal hierarchy.
In "The Canterbury Tales," the Knight and the Squire are part of the feudal system. The Knight represents the noble class as a mounted warrior, while the Squire is his son and serves as his assistant and apprentice. Both characters reflect different aspects of feudal society and its structure.
No, they were all part of the feudal system and held their position due to it.
They had to pay 10% of their income or crops