There was no Roman emperor who fiddled while Rome burned. This was a misinterpretation of the term "fiddling around". It was applied to Nero by a historian of later ages who used the term to connote that Nero, out of frustration, began doing trivial things just to keep occupied , while waiting for the reports of the fire to come in. Besides, the violin had not been invented in Nero's time.
About the only "crazy" thing that Nero did in Rome was the building of his Golden House. Outside of Rome, he performed in plays on stage, took part in contests, and drove chariots. These things outraged the aristocrats but endeared Nero to the general public. By the way, the Golden House was only a crazy thing to the aristocrats; in reality it was a masterpiece of architectural innovation and engineering. He also gave his favorite horse the position of consul. And while Rome was burning in 64 A.D., he was said to have played the fiddle while his city burned down.
he was the first emporer to not be toilet trained
It is a comment made about the emperor Nero during the great fire of Rome. Nero, in his frustration at not being able to have the fire stopped, did trivial and frivolous things while waiting for the gloomy reports. A historian used the term "fiddled while Rome burnt", not in the sense that Nero played the violin (which was unknown at the time), but in the sense that he did meaningless things while waiting--he fiddled around. It is reported that he strummed his lyre and composed a poem about the burning of Troy for want of anything practical to do.
There is absolutely no proof that Nero burned Rome. Even the ancient writers, who were all critical of Nero, admit this. It is the general consensus that the fire started by accident.There is absolutely no proof that Nero burned Rome. Even the ancient writers, who were all critical of Nero, admit this. It is the general consensus that the fire started by accident.There is absolutely no proof that Nero burned Rome. Even the ancient writers, who were all critical of Nero, admit this. It is the general consensus that the fire started by accident.There is absolutely no proof that Nero burned Rome. Even the ancient writers, who were all critical of Nero, admit this. It is the general consensus that the fire started by accident.There is absolutely no proof that Nero burned Rome. Even the ancient writers, who were all critical of Nero, admit this. It is the general consensus that the fire started by accident.There is absolutely no proof that Nero burned Rome. Even the ancient writers, who were all critical of Nero, admit this. It is the general consensus that the fire started by accident.There is absolutely no proof that Nero burned Rome. Even the ancient writers, who were all critical of Nero, admit this. It is the general consensus that the fire started by accident.There is absolutely no proof that Nero burned Rome. Even the ancient writers, who were all critical of Nero, admit this. It is the general consensus that the fire started by accident.There is absolutely no proof that Nero burned Rome. Even the ancient writers, who were all critical of Nero, admit this. It is the general consensus that the fire started by accident.
Tradition has is that Nero played a fiddle while Rome burned. This story is highly speculative. A fiddle is another name for a violin.
According to legend, Nero, although the more famous version states that he played the fiddle while Rome burned (although the fiddle hadn't been invented yet).
No Roman emperor played the fiddle while Rome burned. There is a misconception that Nero played the fiddle while Rome burned due to a misinterpretation of a line in a historical work dating from the Victorian era. The author said Nero was "fiddling around", meaning that he was doing trivial things to keep occupied while waiting for reports of the fire to come in. The uneducated jumped on this and the rumor began, despite the fact that the violin had not even been invented in Nero's time.
The fiddle wasn't invented for another 1,500 years.
That legend is just that, an urban legend about Nero. Nero never played the fiddle while Rome burned. For one the violin had not been invented in Nero's time. He did play his lyre and try to compose a poem about the burning of Troy during the fire, but this was out of a sense of frustration and helplessness, as he could do nothing to check the fire.
Nobody. The fiddle or violin had not been invented at that time. You are probably thinking of the emperor Nero who played his lyre and sang about the burning of Troy as he helplessly watched the fire.
Nero
None of the emperors were responsible for burning down Rome. The misconception is about the emperor Nero who, being helpless in the face of the disaster, spent his time doing trivial things while waiting for reports. In other words, he "fiddled around" while Rome burnt. Besides, Nero's could not possibly have fiddled, because the violin hadn't been invented in his time.
It's an expression to show that Nero was a terrible, selfish emperor of Rome. The expression is "When Rome was burning, Nero fiddled." Rome had a huge fire and burned down while Nero was the leader and he did nothing to help the cause and was very interested in the arts and played the violin so they came up with that statement to show how much he didn't care about the people.
Nero did not fiddle while Rome burned. For one, the violin had not been invented in his time. Nero was an artistic person, and it's said that when he found that there was nothing he could do to quench the fire, he was inspired to compose a poem about the burning of Troy. Now, poetry in the ancient world was sung to the accompaniment of a lyre. So that's about all he could do musically.
Emperor Nero.
Much of the city of Rome burned while Nero was the Roman Emperor.