Rome.
But Nero was not playing a fiddle, that is a complete myth.
Chat with our AI personalities
There was no Roman emperor who fiddled while Rome burned. This was a misinterpretation of the term "fiddling around". It was applied to Nero by a historian of later ages who used the term to connote that Nero, out of frustration, began doing trivial things just to keep occupied , while waiting for the reports of the fire to come in. Besides, the violin had not been invented in Nero's time.
About the only "crazy" thing that Nero did in Rome was the building of his Golden House. Outside of Rome, he performed in plays on stage, took part in contests, and drove chariots. These things outraged the aristocrats but endeared Nero to the general public. By the way, the Golden House was only a crazy thing to the aristocrats; in reality it was a masterpiece of architectural innovation and engineering. He also gave his favorite horse the position of consul. And while Rome was burning in 64 A.D., he was said to have played the fiddle while his city burned down.
he was the first emporer to not be toilet trained
There is absolutely no proof that Nero burned Rome. Even the ancient writers, who were all critical of Nero, admit this. It is the general consensus that the fire started by accident.There is absolutely no proof that Nero burned Rome. Even the ancient writers, who were all critical of Nero, admit this. It is the general consensus that the fire started by accident.There is absolutely no proof that Nero burned Rome. Even the ancient writers, who were all critical of Nero, admit this. It is the general consensus that the fire started by accident.There is absolutely no proof that Nero burned Rome. Even the ancient writers, who were all critical of Nero, admit this. It is the general consensus that the fire started by accident.There is absolutely no proof that Nero burned Rome. Even the ancient writers, who were all critical of Nero, admit this. It is the general consensus that the fire started by accident.There is absolutely no proof that Nero burned Rome. Even the ancient writers, who were all critical of Nero, admit this. It is the general consensus that the fire started by accident.There is absolutely no proof that Nero burned Rome. Even the ancient writers, who were all critical of Nero, admit this. It is the general consensus that the fire started by accident.There is absolutely no proof that Nero burned Rome. Even the ancient writers, who were all critical of Nero, admit this. It is the general consensus that the fire started by accident.There is absolutely no proof that Nero burned Rome. Even the ancient writers, who were all critical of Nero, admit this. It is the general consensus that the fire started by accident.
It is a comment made about the emperor Nero during the great fire of Rome. Nero, in his frustration at not being able to have the fire stopped, did trivial and frivolous things while waiting for the gloomy reports. A historian used the term "fiddled while Rome burnt", not in the sense that Nero played the violin (which was unknown at the time), but in the sense that he did meaningless things while waiting--he fiddled around. It is reported that he strummed his lyre and composed a poem about the burning of Troy for want of anything practical to do.