answersLogoWhite

0

Vespasian was a good emperor. He is sometimes referred to as "the man who saved Rome". The treasury was depleted when he came into power due to Nero's extravagance and the previous civil war. Vespasian, consequently, was forced to tax just about everything--even urine. Fortunately for Rome, Titus was able to conquer Jerusalem and bring back the temple treasure to enrich the Roman state. After this Vespasian was able to embark on his building program of his temple and the Colosseum.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

BeauBeau
You're doing better than you think!
Chat with Beau
BlakeBlake
As your older brother, I've been where you are—maybe not exactly, but close enough.
Chat with Blake
DevinDevin
I've poured enough drinks to know that people don't always want advice—they just want to talk.
Chat with Devin
More answers

Diocletian did both good and bad things for Rome. But he is a good emperor because for one, he wasn't crazy for power. He also changed taxation and max prices to be fair for the people and changed the military. So yes, he was not a bad emperor, more of leaning towards good/decent.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Was Diocletian a good or bad emperor?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp