Yes, he was able to dig the Roman Empire away from their trust issues.
Chat with our AI personalities
I think that he was a good emperor because unlike some other emperors he didn't start off nice then turn bad. He was always for the people. Rome reached its extent when he was ruling. And he didn't force poor people to pay taxes For more info visit Wikipedia
Publius Aelius Traianus Hadrianus born on 24 January 76 AD/ CE became Emperor of Rome at 117 AD/ CE until his death at 138 AD/ CE. During his reign the Empire was extended from the British isles and the Atlantic to Black and Red seas. He was the third of the five good Emperors of Rome.
Vespasian was a good emperor. He is sometimes referred to as "the man who saved Rome". The treasury was depleted when he came into power due to Nero's extravagance and the previous civil war. Vespasian, consequently, was forced to tax just about everything--even urine. Fortunately for Rome, Titus was able to conquer Jerusalem and bring back the temple treasure to enrich the Roman state. After this Vespasian was able to embark on his building program of his temple and the Colosseum.
Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonius Pius, and Marcus Aurelius were the five good emperors.JC MA and Ceaser Auguses JC MA and Ceaser AugusesAugustus that's all i knowBut I love this question xoxoxo question mmmmccchhhhaaaaa!!!!!!!!!!!!
Antoninus Pius was the fourth emperor during the age of the Five Good Emperors. He was known for his peaceful reign and his application of public revenues to securing the prosperity of his subjects.